From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 96452 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2016 21:18:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kawa-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: kawa-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 96413 invoked by uid 89); 18 Feb 2016 21:18:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=eller, loading, re-load, studying X-HELO: aibo.runbox.com Received: from aibo.runbox.com (HELO aibo.runbox.com) (91.220.196.211) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 21:18:38 +0000 Received: from [10.9.9.212] (helo=mailfront12.runbox.com) by bars.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWVy6-0005b2-8F; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:18:34 +0100 Received: from 70-36-239-75.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com ([70.36.239.75] helo=toshie.bothner.com) by mailfront12.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:757155 ) (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) id 1aWVxx-0007ZF-DA; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:18:25 +0100 Subject: Re: RE : Re: What is the Development Environment of Choice for Kawa? To: "Rafik Naccache (TNTeam Rocks!)" , kawa@sourceware.org References: <3go6arm3yvsi6iuungnfyd1o.1455824305674@email.android.com> From: Per Bothner Message-ID: <56C6351E.90107@bothner.com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 21:18:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3go6arm3yvsi6iuungnfyd1o.1455824305674@email.android.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-q1/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2 On 02/18/2016 11:38 AM, Rafik Naccache (TNTeam Rocks!) wrote: > Actually I managed to use swank/sLime with Kawa. But half of its functionality is broken. I'm afraid Swank/Slime with Kawa isn't actively maintained. Helmut Eller wrote/maintained it, but he is no longer involved. I don't know the details - it maybe that the Swank model isn't a great match for Kawa's more static binding mode - or for the JVM. OTOH if you have experience with and were productive with Swank/Clojure, perhaps we can get Swank/Kawa working, possibly by studying how Clojure does things. > I am an emacs guy so this probably helps me, especially as I use smartparens (a new paredit) ans rainbow delimiters. > > Maybe I shall write a Kawa.el mode on emacs Like cider fir clojure, in which case I 'll need some hints on how completion works, etc... > > @ Per, When do you plan to release the code hot loading fixes in SVN? I don't have anything usable at this point, and I'm back-logged on other projects (DomTerm; Kawa arrays; Kawa new invocation model with patterns; more) that I don't know when I'll be able to spend time on it. It's moderately high priority, but so is finishing up various half-finished projects! Until then, you can try the --no-inline flag, and be prepared to re-load everything after changes. One of the big advantages of Kawa that its fast compiler and loading makes re-starting ok. -- --Per Bothner per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/