From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 107050 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2016 22:38:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kawa-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: kawa-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 105699 invoked by uid 89); 18 Feb 2016 22:38:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:1083, Very, states, drawing X-HELO: aibo.runbox.com Received: from aibo.runbox.com (HELO aibo.runbox.com) (91.220.196.211) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:38:36 +0000 Received: from [10.9.9.211] (helo=mailfront11.runbox.com) by bars.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWXDU-0007GG-PV; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:38:32 +0100 Received: from 70-36-239-75.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com ([70.36.239.75] helo=toshie.bothner.com) by mailfront11.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:757155 ) (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) id 1aWXDA-0007BL-Es; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:38:12 +0100 Subject: Re: RE : Re: What is the Development Environment of Choice for Kawa? To: Rafik Naccache [TNTeam] , kawa@sourceware.org References: <3go6arm3yvsi6iuungnfyd1o.1455824305674@email.android.com> <56C6351E.90107@bothner.com> <56C64490.8090204@tnteam.rocks> From: Per Bothner Message-ID: <56C647D1.9090100@bothner.com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:38:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C64490.8090204@tnteam.rocks> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-q1/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2 On 02/18/2016 02:24 PM, Rafik Naccache [TNTeam] wrote: > Actually, scheme's kinda most accomplished tooling on emacs is Geiser : http://www.nongnu.org/geiser/ The following is promising: "In particular, Geiser expects [a REPL] to support namespaces in the form of a module system, and to provide a well-defined way to establish the REPL’s current namespace (or module), as well as the current file’s module (or namespace)." It's good that Geiser is namespace/module-friendly. There is a feature-request: https://github.com/jaor/geiser/issues/55 A comment states: Very loosely, this won't work as expected, apparently: (eval '(...) my-module-environment) Not sure what that refers to. Kawa (as of 2.0) does support environment-specifiers to the eval procedure, but perhaps not quite in the way Geiser wants. > I shall maybe hack on it drawing inspiration from what has been implemented for guile, chicken and racket... That would be great. -- --Per Bothner per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/