From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25150 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2017 00:11:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kawa-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: kawa-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 25093 invoked by uid 89); 2 Mar 2017 00:10:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:sk:kawa@so X-HELO: homiemail-a19.g.dreamhost.com Received: from sub3.mail.dreamhost.com (HELO homiemail-a19.g.dreamhost.com) (69.163.253.7) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:10:58 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a19.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a19.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5605604088 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:10:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from vereq.eip10.org (cpe-74-75-122-130.maine.res.rr.com [74.75.122.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: chaw@eip10.org) by homiemail-a19.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8656E604076 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:10:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from chaw by vereq.eip10.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjEKe-0001hk-MZ for kawa@sourceware.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 19:10:56 -0500 To: kawa Subject: SRFI 147 sample implementation and Kawa From: "Sudarshan S Chawathe" Reply-To: "Sudarshan S Chawathe" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <6554.1488413456.1@vereq.eip10.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <6555.1488413456@vereq.eip10.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-q1/txt/msg00057.txt.bz2 When I try testing the sample implementation for SRFI 147 with Kawa I get errors (below). I have not looked at the SRFI implementation carefully so I do not know whether the problem is with the implementation or Kawa, but I thought I'd mention it here. (A similar test with chibi-scheme works, though.) Sorry for the lack of better details. I tested with the gitlab Kawa 2.3.1 compiled with import.patch (from the include-library-declarations thread) applied. Regards, -chaw [The working directory below is the top-level directory of the SRFI implementation from its github repo.] chaw@vereq:/tmp/srfi-147$ kawa -Dkawa.import.path=3D"./*.sld" tests.scm=20 /tmp/srfi-147/srfi/147/test.sld:33:4: invalid syntax-rules syntax /tmp/srfi-147/srfi/147/test.sld:41:9: invalid syntax-rules syntax /tmp/srfi-147/srfi/147/test.sld:48:9: invalid syntax-rules syntax /tmp/srfi-147/srfi/147/test.sld:59:4: invalid syntax-rules syntax /tmp/srfi-147/srfi/147/test.sld:64:4: no matching syntax-rule for :continua= tion /tmp/srfi-147/srfi/147/test.sld:69:4: no matching syntax-rule for :continua= tion /tmp/srfi-147/srfi/147/test.sld:74:4: no matching syntax-rule for :continua= tion /tmp/srfi-147/srfi/147/test.sld:81:9: no matching syntax-rule for :continua= tion /tmp/srfi-147/srfi/147/test.sld:90:4: invalid syntax-rules syntax /tmp/srfi-147/srfi/147/test.sld:96:44: no matching syntax-rule for :continu= ation /tmp/srfi-147/srfi/147/test.sld:101:4: invalid syntax-rules syntax /tmp/srfi-147/srfi/147/test.sld:107:11: no matching syntax-rule for :contin= uation /tmp/srfi-147/srfi/147/test.sld:107:33: invalid use of '_ /tmp/srfi-147/srfi/147/test.sld:112:4: invalid syntax-rules syntax /tmp/srfi-147/srfi/147/test.sld:117:4: no matching syntax-rule for :continu= ation /tmp/srfi-147/srfi/147/test.sld:131:4: invalid syntax-rules syntax /tmp/srfi-147/srfi/147/test.sld:139:6: no matching syntax-rule for :continu= ation /tmp/srfi-147/srfi/147/test.sld:141:8: define is only allowed in a /tmp/srfi-147/srfi/147/test.sld:142:8: define is only allowed in a chaw@vereq:/tmp/srfi-147$ kawa --version Kawa 2.3.1 (git describe: kawa-2.3-4-gcb36c64-dirty) Copyright (C) 2017 Per Bothner