From: Philippe de Rochambeau <phiroc@free.fr>
To: Philippe de Rochambeau via Kawa <kawa@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Recursive define-syntax
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 07:31:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <762317F5-7B1D-4007-93CE-7FBDBAF16C2C@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <427B2D33-86D0-471D-9CDB-88F2877BE5F8@free.fr>
BTW, Kawa is an amazing piece of software and it is my favorite JVM-based programming language.
Philippe
> Le 27 sept. 2021 à 07 a écrit :
>
> Hi Per,
> Thank you for your feedback.
> The code works on LispKit (cf. https://github.com/objecthub/swift-lispkit) which is based on R7RS. But if it doesn’t work in Kawa, it doesn’t really matter.
>
> #|
> Pamphlet, p. 52
> |#
> (import (lispkit match))
> (import (srfi 48))
>
> (define (dim m)
> (match m
> ((first . rest)
> `(,(length m) . ,(dim first)))
> (_
> '())))
>
> Cheers,
> Philippe
>
>>> Le 26 sept. 2021 à 23:04, Per Bothner <per@bothner.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>
>>
>>> On 9/26/21 05:08, Philippe de Rochambeau via Kawa wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> the following procedure, excerpted from « A Pamphlet Against R »
>>> (define (dim m)
>>> (match m
>>> ((first . rest)
>>> `(,(length m) . ,(dim first)))
>>> (_
>>> '())))
>>> … causes Kawa to display the following error message:
>>> /dev/tty:6:5: unrecognized pattern operator first
>>
>> There is no standard Scheme 'match' syntax - there are a
>> number of different and incompatible extensions. « A Pamphlet Against R »
>> uses the Guile language, which is quite different frm Kawa.
>>
>> Specifically, the Kawa "pattern" syntax is quite limited - it
>> is mainly a proof of concept - a test of the basic framework.
>>
>> Thar said, this seems to work:
>>
>> (define (dim m)
>> (match m
>> ([first rest ...]
>> `(,(length m) . ,(dim first)))
>> (_
>> '())))
>>
>> (dim m0) => (3 4)
>>
>>> Are recursive « syntaxes » not possible in Kawa?
>>
>> Before you ask that question, you should try some code that
>> works on at least one other (preferable two) Scheme implementations.
>> If you have example code that works on other Scheme implementation(s)
>> and does not depend on an implementation-specific extension, but
>> not on Kawa - then we can discuss whether there is a Kawa bug or limitation.
>> --
>> --Per Bothner
>> per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-27 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-26 12:08 Philippe de Rochambeau
2021-09-26 21:04 ` Per Bothner
2021-09-27 5:05 ` Philippe de Rochambeau
2021-09-27 5:31 ` Philippe de Rochambeau [this message]
2021-09-27 16:06 ` Per Bothner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=762317F5-7B1D-4007-93CE-7FBDBAF16C2C@free.fr \
--to=phiroc@free.fr \
--cc=kawa@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).