Re: How to set procedure name in macros

[Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>]

I checked in a fix for the following.
I also checked in a testcase based on yours in testsuite/reflect-fname.scm.  Thanks!

On 01/01/2017 02:59 PM, Duncan Mak wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Happy new year!
>
> In my DEFINE-FOO macro and I noticed that I can't control the name of
> the lambda in the syntax expansion.
>
> Here's a test case -
>
> (define-syntax define-a
>   (lambda (stx)
>     (syntax-case stx ()
>       ((_ name) #`(define name (lambda () #f))))))
>
> (define-syntax define-bar
>   (lambda (stx)
>     (syntax-case stx ()
>       ((_ name) #`(define name (lambda () name: 'bar #f))))))
>
> (define-syntax define-c
>   (lambda (stx)
>     (syntax-case stx ()
>       ((_ name) #`(define name (letrec ((foo (lambda () name: name
> #f))) foo))))))
>
> (define-syntax define-d
>   (lambda (stx)
>     (syntax-case stx ()
>       ((_ name) #`(define name (letrec ((foo (lambda () #f)))
> (set-procedure-property! foo 'name name) foo))))))
>
> (define-a a)
> (format #t "Should say a: ~A~%" (procedure-property a 'name))
> (define-bar b)
> (format #t "Should say bar: ~A~%" (procedure-property b 'name))
> (define-c c)
> (format #t "Should say c: ~A~%" (procedure-property c 'name))
> (define-d d)
> (format #t "Should say d: ~A~%" (procedure-property d 'name))
>
> The output looks like this:
>
> Should say a: a
> Should say bar: b
> Should say c: foo
> Should say d: foo
>
> I'm particularly interested in the C or D cases.
>
> Thanks!
>
>

-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/