From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from aibo.runbox.com (aibo.runbox.com [91.220.196.211]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB82F385DC37 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 01:05:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org EB82F385DC37 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bothner.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=per@bothner.com Received: from [10.9.9.72] (helo=submission01.runbox) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7pYU-0000r4-LM; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 02:05:02 +0100 Received: by submission01.runbox with esmtpsa [Authenticated alias (524175)] (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1l7pYS-0002kc-JK; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 02:05:01 +0100 Subject: Re: Q about format's behavior with ~R directive To: Charles , Sudarshan S Chawathe Cc: Kawa mailing list References: <16367.1612474498@localhost> From: Per Bothner Message-ID: <83822575-857f-4ec8-602a-a1af337488d0@bothner.com> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 17:04:56 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: kawa@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Kawa mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 01:05:09 -0000 On 2/4/21 3:42 PM, Charles via Kawa wrote: > And with that patch I mentioned ... Thanks - checked in. -- --Per Bothner per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/