From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A659B385800B for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 09:10:57 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org A659B385800B X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from nexoid.at ([178.79.130.240]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M8ykW-1kpKhd3yoY-0063uX for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:10:55 +0100 From: "Peter" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 nexoid.at 583EFCD8C To: kawa mailing list Subject: Re: Problems with old kawa android code In-Reply-To: References: <878sa9tif7.fsf@nexoid.at> Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:10:54 +0100 Message-ID: <875z5cu0gx.fsf@nexoid.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:XGR4lOFgCjJ+Q3JIea99M7URu5Ce3q/ZD7KOpvj0zA0dQV0OKNM y1jM5uidzbMI0srk76qlOKByArKOBR4PGolWz8VctFTh7uQl3HnZhL0SnVWcchtsA75xhHi S4zUNJdjQsMhOZJKrapFocgr1oO8F1cIAwuyidi+tjowNtRpB/DIsoQaliECVSL2Jw2ptGQ USb6lpmxKS92Hpdz+XvOg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:OsKF4rVTh5k=:LsMbwSm8zoc2wDZAvLmMt6 /E/+4OVtbQDlMraPVxxnBepqrc07RvnHkybyZgiYSSHBMlLP1f7ucKSN86UyRwOGMldbd4Q0M QrlD4fXumy5zWIKIJaAlYmEeK5ShzNKDlWPNeSbYUkJqS1S/DxqAqHadzEqowZW3tWe7OVpvy g2bLrndCsFPRD9p3yWvs0b6Y9FWMxd60GKC+tZQ/IGQDUbbFjGwbGDywEhvCD0DsOrT2KIO2D zaKshjaRp1sjKOyTDWyegCsGoEUehb9l0aC32L1Mum2FPZO5S2NCZs4LSRvX14BmhCWvrsWb8 EfGwfGnXY5m430mJTfxfixB8PFNxhkSQJi27Ev5RkztZ5zfObrZj3pqlTJkpjwblXmMUBXbAr 83aK4tI7iLPAUUsbzrvfs0wpFpHwVsukgc7yOeRgQwuM3unV9Fm4zA3IJp0+KMRdFvhjnlATq 9umWNzFqWQuBBGsufUNFMZEW0vA7j+44Nhs/qXfxOd7ZYIR36qEY9nXHxa+lr4gHJKrENQoyR WgGLXnn2km3sgWb1j9DzSCSqzu5IShfJQ9U/4WopivTDL/ok88y0hl+OPxl5j9kjml6G3HUOH OhxvpJBJi8Qz5ymAHtUWzLdtLmI3gx6Hg8vg4ocBp0eDtDY9oNR7cV58MEWcFyEYZ9dOUgPEK +wH86g8xt1OswrhtCxBHwcTdg2MQ3yHKT0ekBzrsA46Av+Ci4p7Aji3IemyEsHTLc6k9D2ETc JOAI8JCBQOmFixIJg9N9BdQRKdDQSdUSPawPo8rqVmdvojHWCwE2oB4vtRZiPvZ8NWGuNJkYa VL9BqYVUI6n8ILW/VM9NXdtWjs1/KmvyMvTshWnMaJhmi8E8ekBf5BsLuW4tTCv/Vjj1pJB5/ 4ATi7m70flscmac/7qEQ== X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: kawa@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Kawa mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 09:10:59 -0000 > Short answer: > The simplest fix is probably to remove > (require 'android-defs) > and add whatever aliases you need. Thanks, this worked well! I've run into another (probably unrelated to Android) problem: I use an anonymous subclass of android.os.AsyncTask, which has a function: protected final void publishProgress (Progress... values) If I just use publishProgress directly, kawa complains that no such slot exists, but if I just define-simple-class the subclass (making it non-anonymous), things work fine. Is it possible that there's a bug with anonymous subclasses and protected and/or final functions? Thanks a lot for your help with this! Greetings, Peter