From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 93537 invoked by alias); 1 Jan 2019 21:31:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kawa-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: kawa-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 93528 invoked by uid 89); 1 Jan 2019 21:31:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mail-it1-f177.google.com Received: from mail-it1-f177.google.com (HELO mail-it1-f177.google.com) (209.85.166.177) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 21:31:10 +0000 Received: by mail-it1-f177.google.com with SMTP id i145so38954468ita.4 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 13:31:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6hHQBx/Xeq4uk3Pvh3FW5jB2ODtFp+fHUzAsmXOnEiM=; b=MiB0yIVTE796On2FgTBESqTJ/dGrl9lDn+tPkAFqr5iMHgBbm2Jz4JxxQkxtFH6+v+ LRXNrt3OXLjhzCr7UAQgEcbpBVhcGilX0rdk/oMtFVF7TnXDWbFmwVMMChZQwh/prIZ8 q9zbacjSqmPPb6eLGa31Vo98B5KKNvv38cRmnN83SAO6+0I8n7Vs5CEfuyxbzsThPmDy 6fKvGF+27RNVw6v9NezkK+TayThY6bUzDYy+4ULsdYvUIT6SqRWw7vjtPccoG8+gEK5Y AJrcIHeNGr1P6XUQ7zoteyHxSYL/aPYMhKxVa9QQaX9wcm5/h80uo6bgF5gbxalIRQuZ ZgDA== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <93f2d7a1-69f9-9574-7604-ad7a8df2033e@bothner.com> <008aca45-bf67-e8db-54dc-76930b6682c8@bothner.com> In-Reply-To: <008aca45-bf67-e8db-54dc-76930b6682c8@bothner.com> From: Duncan Mak Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2019 21:31:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Show all warnings and errors To: Per Bothner Cc: kawa mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-q1/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 It looks like this: https://gist.github.com/duncanmak/38f451c9f26ba0000be38d0bd304313b#file-more-changes My patch looks like this: https://gist.github.com/duncanmak/38f451c9f26ba0000be38d0bd304313b#file-sourcemessages-patch On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 4:24 PM Per Bothner wrote: > > On 1/1/19 1:15 PM, Duncan Mak wrote: > > Hmm, my test runner is just an scm file that loads in a few files. > > > > It first loads in a file with some R7RS module definitions, and then I > > load in some test files. > > > > Each of my test files look something like this: > > > > https://gist.github.com/duncanmak/03147dad1cd1697ca9ac3c2a7ee5ca8f > > > > I'm using SRFI 64 (ha! i just realized that's one of your SRFIs!), > > maybe I need to write more code to explicitly instantiate a test > > runner? > > Probably not. First try what I suggested in my previous message, > to see where printAll is being called. That could be a place where > we should (but don't) call Compilation.maxErrors(). > > -- > --Per Bothner > per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/ -- Duncan.