From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 80272 invoked by alias); 1 Jan 2019 21:16:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kawa-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: kawa-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 80262 invoked by uid 89); 1 Jan 2019 21:16:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mail-it1-f172.google.com Received: from mail-it1-f172.google.com (HELO mail-it1-f172.google.com) (209.85.166.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 21:16:18 +0000 Received: by mail-it1-f172.google.com with SMTP id p197so36923530itp.0 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 13:16:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1qKFeMoGfUXKAqQt//+N9TE0eY7RNDhwf6YSACSze9s=; b=WzgK74Fm5bE0rzKdiUErpMW7Po3QaM5E7Y01HXjfj8gEnzmKvCsRoi0j7vS7C5mSv+ gdpQNSuGINbC9czQeqWsq6R8gMeYY7pDgltmws2PlkAczdbTNWJw8opQn0UTJ3KKYjJn J69s6EugUR1QZ5Gn3gwkj1i/8NGTVSuGv4YaTrn75d6oWoEHiajXB/GqRbp8/t6b85+w qPsbqpob5zmSXCN2PB1Z7y53M02qr0JMEokVzZAgv4IHQNn6pzEPgMTZ1DoEhGwe+2fa Eok8Lqx/y1ysgbl4ZxkplmGVKVzfhWFhkUaVJ5AoIRwh6QugVZ+JzY1qa/W9PHscgHid Nkog== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <93f2d7a1-69f9-9574-7604-ad7a8df2033e@bothner.com> In-Reply-To: <93f2d7a1-69f9-9574-7604-ad7a8df2033e@bothner.com> From: Duncan Mak Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2019 21:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Show all warnings and errors To: Per Bothner Cc: kawa mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-q1/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 Hmm, my test runner is just an scm file that loads in a few files. It first loads in a file with some R7RS module definitions, and then I load in some test files. Each of my test files look something like this: https://gist.github.com/duncanmak/03147dad1cd1697ca9ac3c2a7ee5ca8f I'm using SRFI 64 (ha! i just realized that's one of your SRFIs!), maybe I need to write more code to explicitly instantiate a test runner? On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 3:58 PM Per Bothner wrote: > > On 1/1/19 12:47 PM, Duncan Mak wrote: > > I tried out the --max-error=NNN option and it doesn't seem to have > > changed how the output comes out. > > > > Here's what I see: > > https://gist.github.com/duncanmak/38f451c9f26ba0000be38d0bd304313b > > I'm guessing the --max-errors flag isn't being passed down to your test-runner? > > You could try a adding: > > new Error("skipping tests max:"+gnu.expr.Compilation.maxErrors()).printStackTrace(); > > in the place in SourcesMessages.java where the "skipped " message is printed. > > I assume this is all in the same kawa run on a single JVM instance? If not you have to pass > the -max-errors flag to the inferior kawa. > -- > --Per Bothner > per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/ -- Duncan.