From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 107679 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2020 16:08:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kawa-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: kawa-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 107663 invoked by uid 89); 22 Feb 2020 16:08:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*c:alternative X-HELO: mail-lj1-f177.google.com Received: from mail-lj1-f177.google.com (HELO mail-lj1-f177.google.com) (209.85.208.177) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 16:08:42 +0000 Received: by mail-lj1-f177.google.com with SMTP id w1so5434412ljh.5 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 08:08:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EnQymzSJEYTOkYJ62j/yxOogOviwKIzLxYN9MGuUVtY=; b=vP1KsA0gP7xBfSuZs5xyMiAHNu+gf6LpIYmaf/b/h+a6QwFYeY0+wkJFf+l1HidP5N 8ef9/eY+bCxTpWp4nOjW/218JeeYf+e0U/MxZisWO4tRaQWMQN9e21Dc4MqPMyZsRdhJ btaxKK9OjZImSqyozFh8HYRELpqQhMtK5G/doDDl6K0UlaPk4TQ9Upjyx46bq6Uq0PQN 5fhC3H7Ye6nnOGrEDJwLr3yIcE8djXiqEe2TXFRFkshJC+04QS2ZYLtjWZGoTwWpDNq4 48Ww+YDQyMqJ5Vd25DooFh806jYg/uwokpQvuKhg89ELPaJ5SH+/UfWRGBB237P7/0uv 2RCg== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Duncan Mak Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 16:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: SRFI 170 (POSIX API) for Kawa To: Lassi Kortela Cc: kawa mailing list , srfi-170@srfi.schemers.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-q1/txt/msg00022.txt Oh, this is interesting! I wonder if https://github.com/jnr/jnr-posix can be used to implement this. Duncan. On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 4:46 AM Lassi Kortela wrote: > Is anyone working on implementing SRFI 170 for Kawa yet? Since Kawa is > Java-based instead of C-based, and uses pathname objects as well as a > per-thread parameter object to store the current directory, it would > make for a good test case. > -- Duncan.