From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 36853 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2016 17:33:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kawa-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: kawa-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 36842 invoked by uid 89); 12 Feb 2016 17:33:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mail-vk0-f51.google.com Received: from mail-vk0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-vk0-f51.google.com) (209.85.213.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:33:56 +0000 Received: by mail-vk0-f51.google.com with SMTP id k196so66137842vka.0 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:33:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=C+PEhBU4bxagR56LJJWyaOjlOHOWbsHD7Cj3DQtGg0Q=; b=aWafTwQhxIdOCuSV/s8/DCUAWAuXUzNsiFzY/2bxQRczwgyuUpekFa6cEYCaar98er v8ErF8gZLgxVZITT8OCqlPF54zxoRRnPqTUNj52lxdWmSC6YnUvOQ7Gb/VCsgsDEqcX7 dCt5gYfTf69SNNSr/9peqb8/cspk8k3dBq2a3AuhvzsuHlhF6LOP9BJodFFbPibeT+1w avrH/AlPjiM5t08KApY0h5dZ/gt7dLe13y53ElO7luwt/vvouFCK1rExPaH61kaY6wVa T9BxRAFiQp0uUAbfvlHN1ohGdxaiMAAQpw3rkyGVRSPdlBLlRbSfTXZGVbot5pwnXWUa gGiA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQZvPxKtzTQYQON5VVzcnyr7GiPtkFeRj2qeZ8foVbi2hArk7RvCDUfjp8D2DLkCa20MpFnnEik5I9ELg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.194.10 with SMTP id s10mr2389835vkf.72.1455298434102; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:33:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.31.184.133 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:33:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56BD88EF.1070209@bothner.com> References: <56BD34BB.40002@bothner.com> <56BD88EF.1070209@bothner.com> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How do i debug --no-inline or --full-tailcalls options? From: OKUMURA Yuki To: kawa@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-q1/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2 2016-02-12 16:25 GMT+09:00 Per Bothner : - snip - > I now have a fix for this program that I'm satisfied with, > and it's checked in. Great! Now my library tests are passing without --full-tailcalls nor --no-inline. $ run/kawa.sh _sanity.sps (LOADING: "_sanity.sps") Test: 110/110 passed. $ java kawa.repl --version Kawa 2.1.1 (revision 8704) Copyright (C) 2015 Per Bothner