Re: Questions regarding modules

[Marius Kjeldahl <marius.kjeldahl@gmail.com>]

Possibly a delusion on my part, but I was under the assumption that a
module defined without any class declaration could be made, i.e.:

(module-name net.kjeldahl.mymod)
(define (hello)
  "Hello")

which could then somehow be required and used in another module:

(require <net.kjeldahl.mymod>)
....
(net.kjeldahl.mymod:hello)

That assumption may be wrong on my part. But that begs my previous
question on what the module-name declaration does. My earlier testing
shows that it is not needed if I use define-class or similar...

Thanks,

Marius K.


On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Per Bothner <per@bothner.com> wrote:
> On 03/04/2014 10:18 AM, Marius Kjeldahl wrote:
>>
>> I know svn doesn't have push, which is why I quoted it. Consider it a
>> clue on what I'll be "pushing" for when/if I start comitting patches.
>> ;-)
>>
>> I got the r7841 update, but ufortunately I can still not get it
>> working (I've tried various combinations with the < > signs and
>> without, still no luck).
>
>
> Can you show me some simplified sample code? It would be easier for me
> to try it if you make it non-Android-specific.  For example I experimented
> with:
>
> (module-name p.KawaActivity)
> (require <p.HelloKawa>)
> (define-simple-class KawaActivity ()
>   ((onCreate) (HelloKawa:hello)))
>
> ....
>
> (module-name p.HelloKawa)
>
> (define-simple-class HelloKawa ()
>   ((hello) allocation: 'static
>    "Hello from HelloKawa!"))
> ;;(define (hello)
> ;;  "Hello from Kawa!")
> --
>         --Per Bothner
> per@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/