From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw1-x112c.google.com (mail-yw1-x112c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::112c]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C9D43858CD1 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:16:48 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 8C9D43858CD1 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 8C9D43858CD1 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::112c ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1704338209; cv=none; b=CnHoqmblF7Uav+J7z/eiCYeAdvlY3xtZajKDUsbS4kX3lrF9f1Q6UqBVdUu/njkb1YL3jZj5Ob06+qoABea4RdQ5j02WGuEhm++W1nTK5P0WGmRT47iyq6rssBzemwgaMWcf1Dg/7hkU8vGdLcQDh2InJi9CJN5v/axq0XFWS+E= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1704338209; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LZYV1E7glHDWLIjKT/yfal7kHUsKx6LkKNEnayAD8PI=; h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To; b=SLeoYA7BEhgFa4SZFJQbUlMnSIkvJ4wjlQ4RhW4vUFyRxFd154JfBsXNBg1sRBgJ98vqOVwZM67vbPOOTc3RxBs2kBVJyrP9iCxfkfoldN5GspHzq2shn2CUvXTkRFlLbrT1f8kD9RqLDlji2VlZ3O4JKgK9rXerLsoMDEKQJB8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: by mail-yw1-x112c.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-5f215553595so241657b3.1 for ; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 19:16:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704338208; x=1704943008; darn=sourceware.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AY3gr97gRWtZZMJpMxT1FMIjH4rWaMcS631zZNGs6k8=; b=e+y8QzjUq84TK8cuTofu5ph/JEo8ArxTFzC644/FvjzwK8w/5BPH9hmOPhwkKSj2Da bfwpYRGHqBkUuQURVstpsZWVZgv/U08f1Im0T4CPWXpaUeanyIzp51QeIDThMXUVQwES 8hCyzRBcl+N0iGub6xXm8OGXnxQQIkwh9rc24aQp4QIsrk0uSMPQabY8YpG70gDDWbIn cgVB5tBNK+1EChUuST2XhRJjqjlNmgbxOcUrIhB7XBM37Y74fTiABWODaMhsmKnQdGQS kAdhXzIk72zzAv0FAaQOFhU69ryHaLU8g9SyfRLDRsbBx8Qop3+gPWlABWI4kfQqMzYP 89rA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704338208; x=1704943008; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AY3gr97gRWtZZMJpMxT1FMIjH4rWaMcS631zZNGs6k8=; b=d9BOFtQvM4JJzUtmuR6ckJubiLIr6X9+EHoieo0ZxLi58FmCg3StxNMqPZFVcRQAr7 ns9lc+mXSwwAayUnahL/8rGxpf7iRMA80uymG8WHiwbSWMCHeJhGFF3Mu+Amh0wxcHs+ Aj+3MJ/HMpGfd5W7YOoRGOTS0MGfXTq4aTZjilXTttxbI73w2lTljDU/PraSlpS91u7U ag3hHlHbVii/5jL30KesEsyOHIeugAOgaqq5wvcBreiz03g5pRruvhp4DQezUQ8rQUGy cXqVObE/fBTewKSHI3Jjt/3yzkrSEZMMWiR0cevZQYBqu3rlZS20vfMgBi4ZGi+FVEf9 9Veg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxxU0oayD3PW+szjcbuoKVJjMxJCVb0yBZeVe6tu6VO/SNPbKvB zoI0STJxqZrO7Jx+Fpew24nxheiTzH1i0DDVmyRw/oWibHEjEA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEfkwz3DQ/oH+s2sZj9XRJqNJ3HVl3gxFwMfWuyjJvXtHgCKL16nYlCk3ONbPh//isxNch5It1/0bB9nPJajv0= X-Received: by 2002:a0d:ca01:0:b0:5d3:8d73:9bdf with SMTP id m1-20020a0dca01000000b005d38d739bdfmr50384ywd.1.1704338207722; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 19:16:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?UTF-8?B?5LyK6Jek5LiA5YWJ?= Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 12:16:34 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: The command line option --script To: kawa@sourceware.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000072d18f060e16296d" X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: --00000000000072d18f060e16296d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I remember reading some explanation about the command line option "--script", but I do not fully understand it. Now I have got a script which shows significantly different results depending on whether it is run with or without "--script". I would like to know how this happens. Here is my test case. $ java kawa.repl -e '(scheme-implementation-version)' 3.1.1 (git describe: 3.1.1-0-gc47de33ad)$ $ cat 0.scm (include "01.scm") (include "02.scm") (display (format #f "~a ~a ~a ~%" a1 a2 aa)) $ cat 01.scm ;; This is 01.scm (define aa '()) (define-syntax define-a (syntax-rules () ((_ a p) (begin (define a p) (set! aa (cons a aa)))))) $ cat 02.scm ;; This is 02.scm (define-a a1 1) (define-a a2 2) $ java kawa.repl 0.scm 1 2 (2 1) $ java kawa.repl --script 0.scm /home/kaz/02.scm:3:1: duplicate declaration of 'aa' /home/kaz/02.scm:3:1: (this is the previous declaration of 'aa') $ --00000000000072d18f060e16296d--