I think that isolating the bug could be a bit difficult at the moment,
but I might try that later (I feel that this would require a lot of work,
and I'm not sure if I would succeed at the end)

But I did publish the breaking change, in case you'd want to have a look
https://github.com/panicz/grasp/commit/c678761a788a0356c3ecd1caa9f2c7a8bc900f57

(if running with the X server available, it's best to run ./grasp-desktop,
because
all the diagnostic messages go to console But since the program just dies,
running ./grasp-terminal should also be OK. Running ./run-tests 3 also
reproduces
the bug)




wt., 19 gru 2023 o 23:46 Per Bothner <per@bothner.com> napisał(a):

>
>
> On 12/19/23 14:23, Panicz Maciej Godek via Kawa wrote:
> > But when I do this, the system claims that Atom is not Extensive (even
> > though it implements a sub-interface of the Tile interface). How could
> that
> > be?
> I don't know - could be a bug.  There hasn't been a lot of testing of
> interfaces
> defined this way.
>
> If you can create a short (20 lines or so) self-contained test-case,
> I can take a look. It might turn out to be a simple problem.
> --
>         --Per Bothner
> per@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/
>