I'd like to bump a question, would we want to add (for the time being considering only red and tangerine) R7RS-large support? I'm fine with doing necessary work as far as human resources go, but I want to know that this is a direction that people agree with. Shawn, thank you for sharing. Even if it doesn't make it to kawa core, these libraries will be useful to have in personal projects. 2022-10-27, kt, 07:51 Shawn Wagner rašė: > I've ported a lot of SRFIs to Kawa at > https://gitlab.com/shawn_w/kawalib/-/tree/master though I'm not sure if > any of them are included in Red or Tangerine. > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 2:02 AM Arvydas Silanskas via Kawa < > kawa@sourceware.org> wrote: > >> The test suite had been fixed. But then one other thing popped into my >> mind >> -- how about the R7RS large red and tangerine support? The SRFIs required >> seem to be very straightforward, not requiring any pervasive compiler >> hacking but simply defining some simple libraries. I know R7RS large >> colors >> down the road will start including various non-portable / more invasive >> requirements, but we can decide if we want to support those when we get >> there. >> >> 2022-10-03, pr, 14:36 Arvydas Silanskas >> rašė: >> >> > I propose to pause a bit; I remembered one thing that irked me quite a >> > bit, and that is the failing test suite. I think it would be prudent to >> fix >> > it first before the release. As part of the hacktober festive theme, >> I'll >> > try to sit down and find time to make a pull request on the matter soon. >> > >> > Arvydas >> > >> > 2022-09-29, kt, 18:18 Arvydas Silanskas < >> nma.arvydas.silanskas@gmail.com> >> > rašė: >> > >> >> I can go over it on Sunday, if no one else does it by then. >> >> >> >> Arvydas >> >> >> >> 2022-09-29, kt, 07:38 Per Bothner rašė: >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On 9/28/22 10:53, Duncan Mak via Kawa wrote: >> >>> > Hello Per, >> >>> > >> >>> > It's been over two years since the last release (3.1.1, >> 2020-01-16), I >> >>> > count 72 commits made to the master branch since then. >> >>> > >> >>> > Would it be a good time to make a 3.1.2 release soon? >> >>> >> >>> Might as well call it 3.2. >> >>> >> >>> It would be helpful if someone went through the changes >> >>> (using 'git log' and **/ChangeLog) to summarize what has >> >>> change in a format suitable for doc/news.texi. >> >>> >> >>> Also make a note of where the manual needs to be updated. >> >>> >> >>> Minor tweaks and bug fixes don't need to be mentioned. >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> --Per Bothner >> >>> per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/ >> >>> >> >> >> >