From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 124617 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2020 16:48:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kawa-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: kawa-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 124608 invoked by uid 89); 31 Jan 2020 16:48:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BODY_8BITS,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,GARBLED_BODY,GIT_PATCH_2,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:978, online X-HELO: mail-40132.protonmail.ch Received: from mail-40132.protonmail.ch (HELO mail-40132.protonmail.ch) (185.70.40.132) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 16:48:49 +0000 Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 16:48:00 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=default; t=1580489326; bh=JuvUxtyNMzQRnqYX2Cd+S9mLLRk6Xtr0up6AICzSFrE=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From; b=pXDU5keaSd8l1yKb1Dkbee3DSN1LD1RJ7cEVerT3T7NTbM5b23ClM/j2MlGviCBko dWI/2zCZMAYazzJgfo0mHe5xbYbLsg7ZH+Ir9q+kBxFdx14wP46XOaATNYei1ouNT3 D8VmPkkExaaRrZXnha2Z65sbR1gnPXmVRo5hFpJI= To: Per Bothner From: spellcard199 Cc: "kawa@sourceware.org" Reply-To: spellcard199 Subject: Re: Most Kawa-compatible licensing scheme for a new project? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3df35751-5f1f-c18a-67ec-b1fd1d17f6d0@bothner.com> References: <3df35751-5f1f-c18a-67ec-b1fd1d17f6d0@bothner.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-q1/txt/msg00018.txt Sorry, my bad. I should have read https://www.gnu.org/software/kawa/Software-License.html before sending the mail. Some days ago I read some comment online I can't find anymore which said Kawa had this double MIT/GPL license where you could pick the MIT one only if you didn't make any changes to the code and I took it for good without checking. Now I see those modules are not part of the standard distribution anymore. Thank you. =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me= ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 On Friday, January 31, 2020 4:17 PM, Per Bothner wrote: > On 1/31/20 6:44 AM, spellcard199 wrote: > > > Scenario 1: > > > > 1. I distribute my project under the MIT - Expat license > > 2. Since I've choosen the MIT license, I can't include code > > that I have modified after having copied it from Kawa > > > > Why not? > > ----------- > > --Per Bothner > > > per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/