From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (relay8-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.201]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF73E3858430 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:35:53 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org DF73E3858430 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=seketeli.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=seketeli.org Received: (Authenticated sender: dodj@seketeli.org) by relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 209321BF209; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:35:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 52AC61A07C5; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 11:35:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Dodji Seketeli To: Ben Woodard Cc: libabigail@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for the CTF debug format to libabigail. Organization: Me, myself and I References: <20211011084509.9044-1-jose.marchesi@oracle.com> <87lf2ealn8.fsf@seketeli.org> X-Operating-System: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server 7.9 X-URL: http://www.seketeli.net/~dodji Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 11:35:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Ben Woodard's message of "Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:31:11 -0700") Message-ID: <86r1c4yxzc.fsf@seketeli.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libabigail@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list of the Libabigail project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:35:56 -0000 Hello Ben, Ben Woodard a =C3=A9crit: > While you are in that part of the code, I really would like a feature > where it would return a non-zero if the binary didn=E2=80=99t have any > debuginfo available. This can be optional. Something like: > > =E2=80=94require-debuginfo > > I=E2=80=99ve been caught too many times where I think that I have debugin= fo > but it doesn=E2=80=99t and I think everything is fine and there are no ABI > conflicts but in reality libabigail isn=E2=80=99t really doing any useful > testing. That's a fair request, I think.=20 I have filed https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D28515 so that it's not lost. Cheers, --=20 Dodji