From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B051393A06F for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:45:25 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 4B051393A06F Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-330-I5iHBE4dPLePTHxYIntZQA-1; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 07:45:20 -0400 X-MC-Unique: I5iHBE4dPLePTHxYIntZQA-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id w4so17446669wrm.5 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 04:45:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=keckcpuDCtkGoWTnqr1Q9vu6Tu1GKIL06hPu8vmlXRU=; b=Fn6iKvE1tCaz1KRITuDR1yzAedGGdraRpm0pgmEbPXqDEoeAjMzvZfCqptM2EYv5lf UvMKt40AuwRWnYFZt121Wq3H8jK8zXpqCCzM+xsMj+nmTOzKPkJH6HAAzlzl4orFO8vW FzSW2/Tb7TuIeG9AjvQSJ1XgMQZa4VFqsV4/D0Q+ETW/s4HOGvU1cCeuXhMoMryQKbq6 USx++gma5vmeA7XVIV8bGPZ0m7DTcvsLtmrrxI49PpnSTbjfoEIOKr5qMUO4h3IIPblD 7ZJ9totBH6chYX0xde7Co+2ZiqJx4ZLKhq4VLGeRpYc0awYSgOouU+o/X20tpBr1wvuN JZVw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530U/jkC5lYBpdeoNbT8FCjJkG1hn3gfb0GO44pFMb8VS0v7XDxV zlG0ms7MZzbH1cKouet0ZH22IvVIVDb7JxJhfVAwvcP1dl1AxXs9fIZ4osQli5xOY4EX3iWSxZQ 1OLygdN+Ld/QGSRjTkvMU X-Received: by 2002:adf:f60a:: with SMTP id t10mr73501035wrp.64.1594640719440; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 04:45:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx6gQo+d1NmPDv6FvbNegL7FZPBiCx2bl0t6VTUhpQDbfwoLsScKc7mQZHX+K63wSZPuIoiCw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f60a:: with SMTP id t10mr73501011wrp.64.1594640719154; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 04:45:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (91-166-131-130.subs.proxad.net. [91.166.131.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a123sm23741424wmd.28.2020.07.13.04.45.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 04:45:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 40FB21A074D; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 13:45:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Dodji Seketeli To: Mark Wielaard Cc: Benjamin Kosnik , Ben Woodard , Chenxiong Qi , Giuliano Procida , Jan Engelhardt , Jessica Yu , Jonathan Wakely , Matthias Klose , Matthias Maennich , Ondrej Oprala , Roland McGrath , Sinny Kumari , Slava Barinov , libabigail@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Relicensing Libabigail to Apache 2.0 + LLVM Exception Organization: Red Hat / France References: <875zavpisf.fsf@redhat.com> <20200710145857.GB61524@wildebeest.org> X-Operating-System: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server 7.8 X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 13:45:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20200710145857.GB61524@wildebeest.org> (Mark Wielaard's message of "Fri, 10 Jul 2020 16:58:57 +0200") Message-ID: <86sgdvvdte.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libabigail@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list of the Libabigail project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:45:26 -0000 Hello Mark, Mark Wielaard writes: > Hi Dodji, > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 04:05:20PM +0200, Dodji Seketeli via Libabigail wrote: >> This patch series is to relicense the source code of the Libabigail >> project to Apache 2.0 with LLVM Exception. >> >> The rationale and the process of this change was recently presented in >> a message sent to the mailing list of the project at >> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libabigail/2020q2/002388.html. >> >> This patch series needs to be reviewed and acknowledged by all the >> copyright holders who contributed to the project. These contributors >> are all listed in the "To:" field of this message. > > As I said earlier I think dropping all copyleft is the wrong move for > the project. And personally I feel this is very demotivating for > contributing in the future. I understand and respect your point of view ... > But if you believe a majority of the contributors agrees with this > change then I won't block it. ... and I therefore value and greatly appreciate this balanced stance of yours. Thank you for that. > So, if you do get a majority of the contributors to add their > Signed-of-by for the patches, then feel free to also add my > Signed-off-by. Thanks. Cheers, -- Dodji