From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998D3385ED4D for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 14:04:47 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 998D3385ED4D Received: from mail-wr1-f70.google.com (mail-wr1-f70.google.com [209.85.221.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-308-tqvrxAw-M_uYxk1ChryNtg-1; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 10:04:45 -0400 X-MC-Unique: tqvrxAw-M_uYxk1ChryNtg-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id b8so1425576wro.19 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 07:04:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=sWZE3aCLN82lcAYzQFp17N7QrVWFdl1UglHr8WdCqcY=; b=hFzGLbHbXOSDFT0UXXQMy33OnedYJO62JPRjGQI119okIUmYjrDrQ8Elf+oj3P7V8v s+Wtb65YG9J/NIMGGUwsZArvRpX6EyGnocbSksdYol9l1sL7y2kphHHRj235D+8de8zH 7ikLSM9E/L7KIZt/XYPrKC1l5jewUnAqsCwIe9pnXaivPNnO9ZQ41WC6WIlRgvshBr/C SuTofSvttEgSrOrz6p7mhkfBswjI8i2ubO1KKQbB3l3bNwuXa1/KItWWH/fXrZprjFJZ o2xjTTqR+EBiC2aUpZkxfxCTy0VGRGeWsDy0GprKRuyuMlYFcPJNH+eGUUG67T4mRQm0 0Omg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531tnvPUXSkCoYkF0MFVZDqU2mIISSGKpks6Ji0+ByS8XBLgXFXI HayYuMBTLwHAoItzvYbu4pk0DiHY6rLumByxO0Zj6sYlVOdTUUWRlFxr6OYltx3sG+zlSaEhiMl +NLPWZ2DTu5t24hh6Y3Ox X-Received: by 2002:adf:eec2:: with SMTP id a2mr11412903wrp.127.1594821884389; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 07:04:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzC9dGLCfZwWBysIA6O03UTpQwqhe4ahDo4EfvAXYtNHVhqvo8RrSysxsFtjmN9ukpAiTWijg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:eec2:: with SMTP id a2mr11412866wrp.127.1594821884093; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 07:04:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (91-166-131-130.subs.proxad.net. [91.166.131.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u23sm3947705wru.94.2020.07.15.07.04.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 07:04:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8CF7118008A5; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 16:04:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Dodji Seketeli To: Giuliano Procida Cc: Jonathan Wakely , Benjamin Kosnik , Ben Woodard , Chenxiong Qi , Jan Engelhardt , Jessica Yu , Mark Wielaard , Matthias Klose , Matthias Maennich , Ondrej Oprala , Roland McGrath , Sinny Kumari , Slava Barinov , libabigail@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] Replace individual license references with SPDX Identifiers Organization: Red Hat / France References: <871rljpiqr.fsf@redhat.com> <20200710172346.GS4137376@redhat.com> <87pn8zmzux.fsf@redhat.com> X-Operating-System: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation 7.8 Beta X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 16:04:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Giuliano Procida's message of "Mon, 13 Jul 2020 16:24:03 +0100") Message-ID: <878sfknabq.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libabigail@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list of the Libabigail project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 14:04:48 -0000 Hello, Giuliano Procida writes: [...] >> --- a/ltmain.sh >> +++ b/ltmain.sh >> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later >> > > This file has the libtool special exception, does that make this a > different licence? The exception says: As a special exception to the GNU General Public License, if you distribute this file as part of a program or library that is built using GNU Libtool, you may include this file under the same distribution terms that you use for the rest of that program. So we may include it as either GPLv2+ or as the license of the rest of the program. I just left it as GPLv2+. So in practice, I don't think that changes the license. > Signed-off-by: Giuliano Procida Thanks. Cheers, -- Dodji