From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libabigail-return-797-listarch-libabigail=sourceware.org@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 39906 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2016 08:52:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libabigail-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:libabigail@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libabigail-help@sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libabigail-subscribe@sourceware.org>
Sender: libabigail-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 39748 invoked by uid 48); 24 Aug 2016 08:52:32 -0000
From: "dodji at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: libabigail@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug default/20420] Wrong ODR-based type comparison optimization on
 qualified type
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: libabigail
X-Bugzilla-Component: default
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dodji at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dodji at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-20420-9487-NakEIOSIVS@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-20420-9487@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-20420-9487@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2016-q3/txt/msg00092.txt.bz2

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D20420

--- Comment #2 from dodji at redhat dot com ---
(In reply to dodji from comment #1)

> Basically, a const anonymous struct (a qualified type)
> from the second ABI corpus is wrongly being considered equivalent
> to another (different) const anonymous struct from the first ABI corpus.

Sorry, this should rather be:

Basically, a const anonymous struct (a qualified type)
from the second ABI corpus is wrongly being considered equivalent
to another (different) const anonymous struct from that same corpus.

Of course the first corpus and the second corpus happen to be identical in =
the
particular test case of this problem report, but I think the underlying pro=
blem
exists independently from that fact.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.