public inbox for libabigail@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dodji at seketeli dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: libabigail@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug default/21486] missing const when comparing C++ object files
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-21486-9487-rP5tvDFsrD@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-21486-9487@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21486

--- Comment #7 from dodji at seketeli dot org ---
"woodard at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> a
écrit:


> Doing some introspection on libabigail itself with different compilers it flags
> this error:
>
>   [C]'function void abigail::dump(abigail::ir::translation_unit_sptr,
> std::ostream&, bool)' at abg-writer.cc:4091:1 has some indirect sub-type
> changes:
>     parameter 1 of type 'typedef abigail::ir::translation_unit_sptr' changed:
>       entity changed from 'typedef abigail::ir::translation_unit_sptr' to
> 'const abigail::ir::translation_unit_sptr'
>       type size hasn't changed
>     parameter 3 of type 'bool' changed:
>       entity changed from 'bool' to 'const bool'
>       type size hasn't changed

Could you please attach the exact two binaries you were comparing, so
that I am sure to see exactly what you were seeing?

Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-06-03 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-01  0:00 [Bug default/21486] New: " woodard at redhat dot com
2017-01-01  0:00 ` [Bug default/21486] " woodard at redhat dot com
2017-01-01  0:00 ` dodji at seketeli dot org [this message]
2017-01-01  0:00 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2017-01-01  0:00 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2017-01-01  0:00 ` [Bug default/21486] top-level const qualifiers on types of function parameters are not ignored dodji at redhat dot com
2017-01-01  0:00 ` [Bug default/21486] missing const when comparing C++ object files woodard at redhat dot com
2017-01-01  0:00 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2017-01-01  0:00 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2017-01-01  0:00 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2017-01-01  0:00 ` [Bug default/21486] top-level const qualifiers on types of function parameters are not ignored dodji at redhat dot com
2017-01-01  0:00 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2017-01-01  0:00 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2017-01-01  0:00 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2017-01-01  0:00 ` [Bug default/21486] New: missing const when comparing C++ object files Dodji Seketeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-21486-9487-rP5tvDFsrD@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=libabigail@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).