From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libabigail-return-1553-listarch-libabigail=sourceware.org@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 15983 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2019 14:01:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libabigail-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:libabigail@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libabigail-help@sourceware.org>
List-Id: <libabigail.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libabigail-subscribe@sourceware.org>
Sender: libabigail-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 12238 invoked by uid 48); 3 Oct 2019 14:01:28 -0000
From: "dodji at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: libabigail@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug default/25058] abigail does not handle subprogram DIEs with DW_AT_ranges instead of DW_AT_low_pc
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: libabigail
X-Bugzilla-Component: default
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dodji at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dodji at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-25058-9487-50D5LtSN9b@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-25058-9487@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-25058-9487@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-q4/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D25058

dodji at redhat dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #6 from dodji at redhat dot com ---
I confirm I can reproduce this issue.

And yes I agree that we should consider the first address expressed by the
value of the attribute DW_AT_ranges that is carried by the DW_TAG_subprogram
DIE that we are looking at, especially when there is no DW_AT_low_pc attrib=
ute
present.  That address would point to the ELF symbol of the function we are
looking at.

Thank you for taking the time to file this issue and sorry for the
inconvenience.

I am looking at this.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.