From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4A382393BC37; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:34:58 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4A382393BC37 From: "dodji at redhat dot com" To: libabigail@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug default/26769] abixml writer misses some member types in the output Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:34:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: libabigail X-Bugzilla-Component: default X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dodji at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dodji at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: libabigail@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list of the Libabigail project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:34:58 -0000 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D26769 --- Comment #11 from dodji at redhat dot com --- (In reply to Ben Woodard from comment #2) > dodji, this needs to be a standard unit test: >=20 > $ lib=3D/lib64/libabigail.so.0.0.0 > $ abidw $lib >bar; abidiff --harmless bar $lib | less > abidiff: abg-reader.cc:1359: abigail::ir::type_base_sptr > abigail::xml_reader::read_context::build_or_get_type_decl(const string&, > bool): Assertion `__abg_cond__' failed. I agree that this needs to be standard unit test. The problem though, is that it takes a long time (5+ minutes) on the old Rawhide box that I use for hacking here. I guess I'll need to do some performance work on this front at some point again. Until, then, I don't feel like making this test be part of the standard "ma= ke check" of the project. However, I have added a new "make check-self-compare" target to the project which does exactly that. I'll run this from time to time and I'll run it f= or sure before each release. If someone has a powerful build box somewhere to= run this, that would be great as well. The current content of the master branch should now be able to correctly run this. Thanks for pointing this out! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=