From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 182C23858C60; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:06:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 182C23858C60
From: "gprocida at google dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: libabigail@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug default/28319] abidw - regression in treatment of anonymous
 enums in structs
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:06:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: libabigail
X-Bugzilla-Component: default
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gprocida at google dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dodji at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-28319-9487-br5qYqT24n@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-28319-9487@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-28319-9487@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: libabigail@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of the Libabigail project <libabigail.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libabigail>,
 <mailto:libabigail-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libabigail/>
List-Help: <mailto:libabigail-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libabigail>,
 <mailto:libabigail-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:06:18 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D28319

gprocida at google dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED

--- Comment #14 from gprocida at google dot com ---
Hi Dodji.

1. I mentioned on IRC, there is a bit of debris left after your last commit.

git grep use_enum_binary_only_equality

2. Just for the record, if you think this is working as intended, please
re-close the bug.

When I tested in comment 12, I looked for changes in abidw output and there=
 was
none.

There is a regression in abidiff though.

The two enums in these small code fragments

enum E6 { a6 =3D 6 } v6;

enum E6 { a6 =3D 6, b6 =3D 6 } v6;

are treated as ABI equivalent as they share the same set of enumerator valu=
es.

Giuliano.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=