From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id EC8F33858431; Thu,  9 Dec 2021 11:32:45 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EC8F33858431
From: "jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: libabigail@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug default/28641] const'ness of member functions is not detected
 in clang++ binaries
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 11:32:45 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: libabigail
X-Bugzilla-Component: default
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dodji at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-28641-9487-FqZQjUXyXN@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-28641-9487@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-28641-9487@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: libabigail@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of the Libabigail project <libabigail.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libabigail>,
 <mailto:libabigail-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libabigail/>
List-Help: <mailto:libabigail-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libabigail>,
 <mailto:libabigail-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 11:32:46 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D28641

--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to gprocida from comment #10)
> The difference is in the const-ness of the this pointer. It is *not* the
> const-ness of the function (i.e., the constness of *this).

If that's true, this is a very confusing way for abixml to express that:

gcc:
          <member-function access=3D'public' const=3D'yes' vtable-offset=3D=
'7'>

clang:
          <member-function access=3D'public' vtable-offset=3D'7'>

If the "const" attribute here refers to an unobservable and irrelevant deta=
il
of the implicit object parameter, why is it an attribute of the
<member-function> element, not its parameter?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=