From: "woodard at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: libabigail@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug default/28776] New: libprotobuf.so.25.0.0 vfails self test when run on aarch64
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 22:23:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-28776-9487@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28776
Bug ID: 28776
Summary: libprotobuf.so.25.0.0 vfails self test when run on
aarch64
Product: libabigail
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: default
Assignee: dodji at redhat dot com
Reporter: woodard at redhat dot com
CC: libabigail at sourceware dot org
Target Milestone: ---
When libprotobuf.so.25.0.0 is analyzed on aarch64 it fails self test. However,
when the same library is evaluated using the x86_64 abidw then it cpasses a
self test.
[x86_64] $ abidw --abidiff libprotobuf.so.25.0.0
[x86_64] $ echo $?
0
$ abidw --abidiff /lib64/libprotobuf.so.25.0.0
Functions changes summary: 0 Removed, 5 Changed, 0 Added functions
Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added variable
5 functions with some indirect sub-type change:
[C] 'function const google::protobuf::Option*
google::protobuf::util::converter::FindOptionOrNull(const
google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<google::protobuf::Option>&,
google::protobuf::StringPiece)' at utility.cc:143:1 has some indirect sub-type
changes:
parameter 1 of type 'const
google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<google::protobuf::Option>&' has sub-type
changes:
in referenced type 'const
google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<google::protobuf::Option>':
in unqualified underlying type 'class
google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<google::protobuf::Option>' at
repeated_field.h:921:1:
type size hasn't changed
1 base class change:
'class google::protobuf::internal::RepeatedPtrFieldBase' at
repeated_field.h:578:1 changed:
type size hasn't changed
1 data member change:
type of 'google::protobuf::internal::RepeatedPtrFieldBase::Rep*
rep_' changed:
in pointed to type 'struct
google::protobuf::internal::RepeatedPtrFieldBase::Rep' at
repeated_field.h:737:1:
type size hasn't changed
[C] 'function bool
google::protobuf::util::converter::GetBoolOptionOrDefault(const
google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<google::protobuf::Option>&,
google::protobuf::StringPiece, bool)' at utility.cc:56:1 has some indirect
sub-type changes:
parameter 1 of type 'const
google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<google::protobuf::Option>&' has sub-type
changes:
in referenced type 'const
google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<google::protobuf::Option>':
unqualified underlying type 'class
google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<google::protobuf::Option>' changed at
repeated_field.h:921:1, as reported earlier
[C] 'function double
google::protobuf::util::converter::GetDoubleOptionOrDefault(const
google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<google::protobuf::Option>&,
google::protobuf::StringPiece, double)' at utility.cc:76:1 has some indirect
sub-type changes:
parameter 1 of type 'const
google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<google::protobuf::Option>&' has sub-type
changes:
in referenced type 'const
google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<google::protobuf::Option>':
unqualified underlying type 'class
google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<google::protobuf::Option>' changed at
repeated_field.h:921:1, as reported earlier
[C] 'function google::protobuf::int64
google::protobuf::util::converter::GetInt64OptionOrDefault(const
google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<google::protobuf::Option>&,
google::protobuf::StringPiece, google::protobuf::int64)' at utility.cc:66:1 has
some indirect sub-type changes:
parameter 1 of type 'const
google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<google::protobuf::Option>&' has sub-type
changes:
in referenced type 'const
google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<google::protobuf::Option>':
unqualified underlying type 'class
google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<google::protobuf::Option>' changed at
repeated_field.h:921:1, as reported earlier
[C] 'function std::string
google::protobuf::util::converter::GetStringOptionOrDefault(const
google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<google::protobuf::Option>&,
google::protobuf::StringPiece, google::protobuf::StringPiece)' at
utility.cc:86:1 has some indirect sub-type changes:
parameter 1 of type 'const
google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<google::protobuf::Option>&' has sub-type
changes:
in referenced type 'const
google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<google::protobuf::Option>':
unqualified underlying type 'class
google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<google::protobuf::Option>' changed at
repeated_field.h:921:1, as reported earlier
[x86_64] $ sum libprotobuf.so.25.0.0
14359 2913
[aarch64] $ sum /lib64/libprotobuf.so.25.0.0
14359 2913
[aarch64] $ rpm -qf /lib64/libprotobuf.so.25.0.0
protobuf-3.14.0-6.fc35.aarch64
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next reply other threads:[~2022-01-12 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-12 22:23 woodard at redhat dot com [this message]
2022-01-12 22:24 ` [Bug default/28776] " woodard at redhat dot com
2022-06-28 22:29 ` woodard at redhat dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-28776-9487@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=libabigail@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).