* [Bug default/29299] New: binutils does not self compare properly
@ 2022-06-29 19:16 woodard at redhat dot com
2022-06-29 19:17 ` [Bug default/29299] " woodard at redhat dot com
` (13 more replies)
0 siblings, 14 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: woodard at redhat dot com @ 2022-06-29 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libabigail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29299
Bug ID: 29299
Summary: binutils does not self compare properly
Product: libabigail
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: default
Assignee: dodji at redhat dot com
Reporter: woodard at redhat dot com
CC: libabigail at sourceware dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 14183
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14183&action=edit
huge list of errors
This is with the latest trunk as of: 7006c5f3c49b92f066a8f415e87b35a5c2afd32c
$ abidw --abidiff /usr/lib64/libbfd-2.37-27.fc36.so
from binutils-2.37-27.fc36.x86_64
There are many errors and so I just attached a file with them.
This was not a problem in 2.0.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug default/29299] binutils does not self compare properly
2022-06-29 19:16 [Bug default/29299] New: binutils does not self compare properly woodard at redhat dot com
@ 2022-06-29 19:17 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-06-29 20:10 ` woodard at redhat dot com
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: woodard at redhat dot com @ 2022-06-29 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libabigail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29299
Ben Woodard <woodard at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |27019
Referenced Bugs:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27019
[Bug 27019] BUILD metabug
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug default/29299] binutils does not self compare properly
2022-06-29 19:16 [Bug default/29299] New: binutils does not self compare properly woodard at redhat dot com
2022-06-29 19:17 ` [Bug default/29299] " woodard at redhat dot com
@ 2022-06-29 20:10 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-06-29 20:16 ` woodard at redhat dot com
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: woodard at redhat dot com @ 2022-06-29 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libabigail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29299
--- Comment #1 from Ben Woodard <woodard at redhat dot com> ---
Other binaries have very similar problems which I think are likely related:
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10 from gimp-2.10.30-1.fc36.1.x86_64
$ abidw --abidiff /usr/bin/gimp-2.10
Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added variable
161 functions with some indirect sub-type change:
[C] 'function gboolean gimp_image_add_channel(GimpImage*, GimpChannel*,
GimpChannel*, gint, gboolean)' at gimpimage.c:4880:1 has some indirect sub-type
changes:
parameter 1 of type 'GimpImage*' has sub-type changes:
in pointed to type 'typedef GimpImage' at core-types.h:90:1:
underlying type 'struct _GimpImage' at gimpimage.h:39:1 changed:
type size hasn't changed
2 data member changes:
type of 'Gimp* gimp' changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef Gimp' at core-types.h:89:1:
underlying type 'struct _Gimp' at gimp.h:35:1 changed:
type size hasn't changed
3 data member changes:
type of 'GimpImage* clipboard_image' changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef GimpImage' at
core-types.h:90:1:
underlying type 'struct _GimpImage' changed, as being
reported
type of 'GimpContext* default_context' changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef GimpContext' at
core-types.h:114:1:
underlying type 'struct _GimpContext' at
gimpcontext.h:47:1 changed:
type size hasn't changed
3 data member changes:
type of 'Gimp* gimp' changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef Gimp' at
core-types.h:89:1:
underlying type 'struct _Gimp' changed, as
being reported
type of 'GimpContext* parent' changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef GimpContext' at
core-types.h:114:1:
underlying type 'struct _GimpContext' changed,
as being reported
type of 'GimpImage* image' changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef GimpImage' at
core-types.h:90:1:
underlying type 'struct _GimpImage' changed, as
being reported
type of 'GimpContext* user_context' changed:
pointed to type 'typedef GimpContext' changed at
core-types.h:114:1, as reported earlier
type of 'GimpImagePrivate* priv' changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef GimpImagePrivate' at
gimpimage.h:37:1:
underlying type 'struct _GimpImagePrivate' at
gimpimage-private.h:33:1 changed:
type size hasn't changed
3 data member changes:
type of 'GimpSymmetry* active_symmetry' changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef GimpSymmetry' at
core-types.h:176:1:
underlying type 'struct _GimpSymmetry' at
gimpsymmetry.h:42:1 changed:
type size hasn't changed
1 data member change:
type of 'GimpImage* image' changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef GimpImage' at
core-types.h:90:1:
underlying type 'struct _GimpImage' changed, as
being reported
type of 'GimpUndoStack* undo_stack' changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef GimpUndoStack' at
core-types.h:170:1:
underlying type 'struct _GimpUndoStack' at
gimpundostack.h:35:1 changed:
type size hasn't changed
1 data member change:
type of 'GimpUndo parent_instance' changed:
underlying type 'struct _GimpUndo' at
gimpundo.h:52:1 changed:
type size hasn't changed
1 data member change:
type of 'GimpImage* image' changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef GimpImage' at
core-types.h:90:1:
underlying type 'struct _GimpImage'
changed, as being reported
type of 'GimpUndoStack* redo_stack' changed:
pointed to type 'typedef GimpUndoStack' changed at
core-types.h:170:1, as reported earlier
[C] 'function void gimp_image_add_colormap_entry(GimpImage*, const GimpRGB*)'
at gimpimage-colormap.c:303:1 has some indirect sub-type changes:
parameter 1 of type 'GimpImage*' has sub-type changes:
in pointed to type 'typedef GimpImage' at core-types.h:90:1:
underlying type 'struct _GimpImage' at gimpimage.h:39:1 changed:
type size hasn't changed
1 data member change:
type of 'Gimp* gimp' changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef Gimp' at core-types.h:89:1:
underlying type 'struct _Gimp' at gimp.h:35:1 changed:
type size hasn't changed
1 data member change:
type of 'GimpImage* clipboard_image' changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef GimpImage' at
core-types.h:90:1:
underlying type 'struct _GimpImage' changed, as being
reported
<snip>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug default/29299] binutils does not self compare properly
2022-06-29 19:16 [Bug default/29299] New: binutils does not self compare properly woodard at redhat dot com
2022-06-29 19:17 ` [Bug default/29299] " woodard at redhat dot com
2022-06-29 20:10 ` woodard at redhat dot com
@ 2022-06-29 20:16 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-06-29 20:23 ` woodard at redhat dot com
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: woodard at redhat dot com @ 2022-06-29 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libabigail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29299
--- Comment #2 from Ben Woodard <woodard at redhat dot com> ---
from: infinipath-psm-3.3-26_g604758e_open.6.fc36.5.x86_64
$ abidw --abidiff /usr/lib64/libpsm_infinipath.so.1.1
Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added variable
53 functions with some indirect sub-type change:
[C] 'function psm_error_t __psm_am_register_handlers(psm_ep_t, const
psm_am_handler_fn_t*, int, int*)' at psm_am.c:72:1 has some indirect sub-type
changes:
Please note that the symbol of this function is __psm_am_register_handlers
and it aliases symbol: psm_am_register_handlers
parameter 2 of type 'const psm_am_handler_fn_t*' has sub-type changes:
in pointed to type 'const psm_am_handler_fn_t':
in unqualified underlying type 'typedef psm_am_handler_fn_t' at
psm_am.h:102:1:
underlying type 'int (typedef psm_am_token_t, typedef psm_epaddr_t,
psm_amarg_t*, int, void*, typedef uint32_t)*' changed:
in pointed to type 'function type int (typedef psm_am_token_t,
typedef psm_epaddr_t, psm_amarg_t*, int, void*, typedef uint32_t)':
parameter 2 of type 'typedef psm_epaddr_t' has sub-type changes:
underlying type 'psm_epaddr*' changed:
in pointed to type 'struct psm_epaddr' at psm_ep.h:195:1:
type size hasn't changed
8 data member changes:
type of 'ptl_ctl_t* ptlctl' changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef ptl_ctl_t' at ptl.h:64:1:
underlying type 'struct ptl_ctl' at ptl.h:115:1
changed:
type size hasn't changed
5 data member changes:
type of 'typedef psm_error_t (typedef psm_mq_t,
typedef psm_epaddr_t, typedef uint32_t, typedef uint64_t, void*, typedef
uint32_t)* mq_send' changed:
in pointed to type 'function type typedef
psm_error_t (typedef psm_mq_t, typedef psm_epaddr_t, typedef uint32_t, typedef
uint64_t, void*, typedef uint32_t)':
parameter 1 of type 'typedef psm_mq_t' has
sub-type changes:
underlying type 'psm_mq*' changed:
in pointed to type 'struct psm_mq' at
psm_mq_internal.h:69:1:
type size hasn't changed
3 data member changes:
type of 'mqsq expected_q' changed:
type size hasn't changed
2 data member changes:
type of 'psm_mq_req_t first'
changed:
underlying type 'psm_mq_req*'
changed:
in pointed to type 'struct
psm_mq_req' at psm_mq_internal.h:159:1:
type size hasn't changed
7 data member changes:
type of 'anonymous data
member struct {psm_mq_req_t next; psm_mq_req_t* pprev;}' changed:
type size hasn't
changed
2 data member changes:
type of 'psm_mq_req_t
next' changed:
underlying type
'psm_mq_req*' changed:
pointed to type
'struct psm_mq_req' changed, as being reported
type of
'psm_mq_req_t* pprev' changed:
pointed to type
'typedef psm_mq_req_t' changed at psm_mq.h:149:1, as reported earlier
type of 'psm_mq_t mq'
changed:
underlying type
'psm_mq*' changed:
pointed to type
'struct psm_mq' changed, as being reported
type of
'mq_testwait_callback_fn_t testwait_callback' changed:
underlying type
'typedef psm_error_t (psm_mq_req_t*, int, psm_mq_status_t*)*' changed:
in pointed to type
'function type typedef psm_error_t (psm_mq_req_t*, int, psm_mq_status_t*)':
parameter 1 of type
'psm_mq_req_t*' has sub-type changes:
pointed to type
'typedef psm_mq_req_t' changed at psm_mq.h:149:1, as reported earlier
type of 'struct
{psm_mq_req* stqe_next;} nextq' changed:
type size hasn't
changed
1 data member change:
type of 'psm_mq_req*
stqe_next' changed:
pointed to type
'struct psm_mq_req' changed, as being reported
type of 'psm_epaddr_t
epaddr' changed:
underlying type
'psm_epaddr*' changed:
pointed to type
'struct psm_epaddr' changed, as being reported
type of
'mq_rts_callback_fn_t rts_callback' changed:
underlying type
'typedef psm_error_t (typedef psm_mq_req_t, int)*' changed:
in pointed to type
'function type typedef psm_error_t (typedef psm_mq_req_t, int)':
parameter 1 of type
'typedef psm_mq_req_t' has sub-type changes:
underlying type
'psm_mq_req*' changed:
pointed to type
'struct psm_mq_req' changed, as being reported
type of 'psm_epaddr_t
rts_peer' changed, as reported earlier
type of 'psm_mq_req_t* lastp'
changed:
pointed to type 'typedef
psm_mq_req_t' changed at psm_mq.h:149:1, as reported earlier
type of 'mqsq unexpected_q' changed,
as reported earlier
type of 'mqq completed_q' changed:
type size hasn't changed
2 data member changes:
type of 'psm_mq_req_t first'
changed, as reported earlier
type of 'psm_mq_req_t* lastp'
changed:
pointed to type 'typedef
psm_mq_req_t' changed at psm_mq.h:149:1, as reported earlier
parameter 2 of type 'typedef psm_epaddr_t'
has sub-type changes:
underlying type 'psm_epaddr*' changed:
pointed to type 'struct psm_epaddr'
changed, as being reported
type of 'typedef psm_error_t (typedef psm_mq_t,
typedef psm_epaddr_t, typedef uint32_t, typedef uint64_t, void*, typedef
uint32_t, void*, psm_mq_req_t*)* mq_isend' changed:
in pointed to type 'function type typedef
psm_error_t (typedef psm_mq_t, typedef psm_epaddr_t, typedef uint32_t, typedef
uint64_t, void*, typedef uint32_t, void*, psm_mq_req_t*)':
<snip>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug default/29299] binutils does not self compare properly
2022-06-29 19:16 [Bug default/29299] New: binutils does not self compare properly woodard at redhat dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-29 20:16 ` woodard at redhat dot com
@ 2022-06-29 20:23 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-06-29 20:39 ` woodard at redhat dot com
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: woodard at redhat dot com @ 2022-06-29 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libabigail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29299
--- Comment #3 from Ben Woodard <woodard at redhat dot com> ---
from: libXt-1.2.1-2.fc36.x86_64 /usr/lib64/libXt.so.6.0.0
Functions changes summary: 0 Removed, 66 Changed, 0 Added functions
Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added variable
66 functions with some indirect sub-type change:
[C] 'function XtActionHookId XtAppAddActionHook(XtAppContext,
XtActionHookProc, XtPointer)' at ActionHook.c:93:1 has some indirect sub-type
changes:
parameter 1 of type 'typedef XtAppContext' has sub-type changes:
underlying type '_XtAppStruct*' changed:
in pointed to type 'struct _XtAppStruct' at InitialI.h:151:1:
type size hasn't changed
14 data member changes:
type of 'XtAppContext next' changed:
underlying type '_XtAppStruct*' changed:
pointed to type 'struct _XtAppStruct' changed, as being
reported
type of 'ProcessContext process' changed:
underlying type '_ProcessContextRec*' changed:
in pointed to type 'struct _ProcessContextRec' at
InitialI.h:135:1:
type size hasn't changed
2 data member changes:
type of 'XtAppContext defaultAppContext' changed, as
reported earlier
type of 'XtAppContext appContextList' changed, as reported
earlier
type of 'TimerEventRec* timerQueue' changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef TimerEventRec' at InitialI.h:92:1:
underlying type 'struct _TimerEventRec' at InitialI.h:86:1
changed:
type size hasn't changed
2 data member changes:
type of '_TimerEventRec* te_next' changed:
pointed to type 'struct _TimerEventRec' changed, as being
reported
type of 'XtAppContext app' changed, as reported earlier
type of 'WorkProcRec* workQueue' changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef WorkProcRec' at InitialI.h:117:1:
underlying type 'struct _WorkProcRec' at InitialI.h:112:1
changed:
type size hasn't changed
2 data member changes:
type of '_WorkProcRec* next' changed:
pointed to type 'struct _WorkProcRec' changed, as being
reported
type of 'XtAppContext app' changed, as reported earlier
type of 'InputEvent** input_list' changed:
in pointed to type 'InputEvent*':
in pointed to type 'typedef InputEvent' at InitialI.h:102:1:
underlying type 'struct _InputEvent' at InitialI.h:94:1
changed:
type size hasn't changed
3 data member changes:
type of '_InputEvent* ie_next' changed:
pointed to type 'struct _InputEvent' changed, as being
reported
type of '_InputEvent* ie_oq' changed:
pointed to type 'struct _InputEvent' changed, as being
reported
type of 'XtAppContext app' changed, as reported earlier
type of 'InputEvent* outstandingQueue' changed:
pointed to type 'typedef InputEvent' changed at InitialI.h:102:1,
as reported earlier
type of 'SignalEventRec* signalQueue' changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef SignalEventRec' at InitialI.h:110:1:
underlying type 'struct _SignalEventRec' at InitialI.h:104:1
changed:
type size hasn't changed
2 data member changes:
type of '_SignalEventRec* se_next' changed:
pointed to type 'struct _SignalEventRec' changed, as
being reported
type of 'XtAppContext app' changed, as reported earlier
type of '_ActionHookRec* action_hook_list' changed:
in pointed to type 'struct _ActionHookRec' at TranslateI.h:292:1:
type size hasn't changed
2 data member changes:
type of '_ActionHookRec* next' changed:
pointed to type 'struct _ActionHookRec' changed, as being
reported
type of 'XtAppContext app' changed, as reported earlier
type of '_BlockHookRec* block_hook_list' changed:
in pointed to type 'struct _BlockHookRec' at EventI.h:87:1:
type size hasn't changed
2 data member changes:
type of '_BlockHookRec* next' changed:
pointed to type 'struct _BlockHookRec' changed, as being
reported
type of 'XtAppContext app' changed, as reported earlier
type of 'ThreadAppProc lock' changed:
underlying type 'void (typedef XtAppContext)*' changed:
in pointed to type 'function type void (typedef XtAppContext)':
parameter 1 of type 'typedef XtAppContext' has sub-type
changes:
underlying type '_XtAppStruct*' changed:
pointed to type 'struct _XtAppStruct' changed, as being
reported
type of 'ThreadAppProc unlock' changed, as reported earlier
type of 'ThreadAppYieldLockProc yield_lock' changed:
underlying type 'void (typedef XtAppContext, Boolean*, Boolean*,
int*)*' changed:
in pointed to type 'function type void (typedef XtAppContext,
Boolean*, Boolean*, int*)':
parameter 1 of type 'typedef XtAppContext' has sub-type
changes:
underlying type '_XtAppStruct*' changed:
pointed to type 'struct _XtAppStruct' changed, as being
reported
type of 'ThreadAppRestoreLockProc restore_lock' changed:
underlying type 'void (typedef XtAppContext, int, Boolean*)*'
changed:
in pointed to type 'function type void (typedef XtAppContext,
int, Boolean*)':
parameter 1 of type 'typedef XtAppContext' has sub-type
changes:
underlying type '_XtAppStruct*' changed:
pointed to type 'struct _XtAppStruct' changed, as being
reported
type of 'ThreadAppProc free_lock' changed, as reported earlier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug default/29299] binutils does not self compare properly
2022-06-29 19:16 [Bug default/29299] New: binutils does not self compare properly woodard at redhat dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-29 20:23 ` woodard at redhat dot com
@ 2022-06-29 20:39 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-06-29 20:45 ` woodard at redhat dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: woodard at redhat dot com @ 2022-06-29 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libabigail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29299
--- Comment #4 from Ben Woodard <woodard at redhat dot com> ---
openmpi-4.1.2-3.fc36.i686.rpm
======== comparing'libmpi.so.40.30.2' to itself wrongly yielded result:
===========
Functions changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed (92 filtered out), 0 Added
functions
Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added variable
abidw --abidiff /lib64/openmpi/lib/libmpi.so.40.30.2
[C] 'function int PMPI_Cart_create(MPI_Comm, int, const int*, const int*,
int, MPI_Comm*)' at pcart_create.c:45:1 has some indirect sub-type changes:
Please note that the symbol of this function is PMPI_Cart_create
and it aliases symbol: MPI_Cart_create
parameter 6 of type 'MPI_Comm*' changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef MPI_Comm' at mpi.h:419:1:
<snip>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug default/29299] binutils does not self compare properly
2022-06-29 19:16 [Bug default/29299] New: binutils does not self compare properly woodard at redhat dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-29 20:39 ` woodard at redhat dot com
@ 2022-06-29 20:45 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-06-29 20:52 ` woodard at redhat dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: woodard at redhat dot com @ 2022-06-29 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libabigail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29299
--- Comment #5 from Ben Woodard <woodard at redhat dot com> ---
From: zfs-fuse-0.7.2.2-21.fc36.x86_64.rpm and
zfs-fuse-0.7.2.2-21.fc36.x86_64.rpm:
======== comparing'zfs-fuse' to itself wrongly yielded result: ===========
Functions changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added function
Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed (6 filtered out), 0 Added
variables
===SELF CHECK FAILED for 'zfs-fuse'
$ abidw /usr/sbin/zfs-fuse > foo
$ abidiff --harmless /usr/sbin/zfs-fuse foo
Functions changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added function
Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 6 Changed, 0 Added variables
6 Changed variables:
[C] 'vnodeops_t* zfs_dvnodeops' was changed to 'vnodeops* zfs_dvnodeops' at
zfs_znode.c:385:1:
type of variable changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef vnodeops_t' at vnode.h:544:1:
entity changed from 'typedef vnodeops_t' to compatible type 'struct
vnodeops' at vnode.h:544:1
[C] 'vnodeops_t* zfs_evnodeops' was changed to 'vnodeops* zfs_evnodeops' at
zfs_znode.c:389:1:
type of variable changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef vnodeops_t' at vnode.h:544:1:
entity changed from 'typedef vnodeops_t' to compatible type 'struct
vnodeops' at vnode.h:544:1
[C] 'vnodeops_t* zfs_fvnodeops' was changed to 'vnodeops* zfs_fvnodeops' at
zfs_znode.c:386:1:
type of variable changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef vnodeops_t' at vnode.h:544:1:
entity changed from 'typedef vnodeops_t' to compatible type 'struct
vnodeops' at vnode.h:544:1
[C] 'vnodeops_t* zfs_sharevnodeops' was changed to 'vnodeops*
zfs_sharevnodeops' at zfs_znode.c:390:1:
type of variable changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef vnodeops_t' at vnode.h:544:1:
entity changed from 'typedef vnodeops_t' to compatible type 'struct
vnodeops' at vnode.h:544:1
[C] 'vnodeops_t* zfs_symvnodeops' was changed to 'vnodeops* zfs_symvnodeops'
at zfs_znode.c:387:1:
type of variable changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef vnodeops_t' at vnode.h:544:1:
entity changed from 'typedef vnodeops_t' to compatible type 'struct
vnodeops' at vnode.h:544:1
[C] 'vnodeops_t* zfs_xdvnodeops' was changed to 'vnodeops* zfs_xdvnodeops' at
zfs_znode.c:388:1:
type of variable changed:
in pointed to type 'typedef vnodeops_t' at vnode.h:544:1:
entity changed from 'typedef vnodeops_t' to compatible type 'struct
vnodeops' at vnode.h:544:1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug default/29299] binutils does not self compare properly
2022-06-29 19:16 [Bug default/29299] New: binutils does not self compare properly woodard at redhat dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-29 20:45 ` woodard at redhat dot com
@ 2022-06-29 20:52 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-07-05 20:10 ` woodard at redhat dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: woodard at redhat dot com @ 2022-06-29 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libabigail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29299
--- Comment #6 from Ben Woodard <woodard at redhat dot com> ---
summary list of binaries and packages which have what appears to be the same
problem:
/usr/lib64/libbfd-2.37-27.fc36.so binutils-2.37-27.fc36.x86_64
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10 gimp-2.10.30-1.fc36.1.x86_64
/usr/lib64/libpsm_infinipath.so.1.1
infinipath-psm-3.3-26_g604758e_open.6.fc36.5.x86_64
/usr/lib64/libXt.so.6.0.0 libXt-1.2.1-2.fc36.x86_64
/lib64/openmpi/lib/libmpi.so.40.30.2 openmpi-4.1.2-3.fc36.i686.rpm
/usr/sbin/zfs-fuse zfs-fuse-0.7.2.2-21.fc36.x86_64.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug default/29299] binutils does not self compare properly
2022-06-29 19:16 [Bug default/29299] New: binutils does not self compare properly woodard at redhat dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-29 20:52 ` woodard at redhat dot com
@ 2022-07-05 20:10 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-07-25 21:26 ` woodard at redhat dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: woodard at redhat dot com @ 2022-07-05 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libabigail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29299
--- Comment #7 from Ben Woodard <woodard at redhat dot com> ---
This continues to appear with the latest trunk as of 4cf16bdb
dwarf-reader,ir: Don't canonicalize enums too early & too naively
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug default/29299] binutils does not self compare properly
2022-06-29 19:16 [Bug default/29299] New: binutils does not self compare properly woodard at redhat dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-05 20:10 ` woodard at redhat dot com
@ 2022-07-25 21:26 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-07-26 20:04 ` woodard at redhat dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: woodard at redhat dot com @ 2022-07-25 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libabigail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29299
--- Comment #8 from Ben Woodard <woodard at redhat dot com> ---
This continues to happen with trunk up through
df28c220976f41620b0bd7b22000815e11f66b75
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug default/29299] binutils does not self compare properly
2022-06-29 19:16 [Bug default/29299] New: binutils does not self compare properly woodard at redhat dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-25 21:26 ` woodard at redhat dot com
@ 2022-07-26 20:04 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-07-26 20:07 ` woodard at redhat dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: woodard at redhat dot com @ 2022-07-26 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libabigail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29299
Ben Woodard <woodard at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |29413
Referenced Bugs:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29413
[Bug 29413] libabigail 2.1 self-compare metabug
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug default/29299] binutils does not self compare properly
2022-06-29 19:16 [Bug default/29299] New: binutils does not self compare properly woodard at redhat dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-26 20:04 ` woodard at redhat dot com
@ 2022-07-26 20:07 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-07-26 20:11 ` woodard at redhat dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: woodard at redhat dot com @ 2022-07-26 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libabigail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29299
--- Comment #9 from Ben Woodard <woodard at redhat dot com> ---
gimp seems to pass now it must have been one of the other recently fixed bugs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug default/29299] binutils does not self compare properly
2022-06-29 19:16 [Bug default/29299] New: binutils does not self compare properly woodard at redhat dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-26 20:07 ` woodard at redhat dot com
@ 2022-07-26 20:11 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-10-14 16:00 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-10-14 16:03 ` woodard at redhat dot com
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: woodard at redhat dot com @ 2022-07-26 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libabigail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29299
--- Comment #10 from Ben Woodard <woodard at redhat dot com> ---
infinipath-psm, libXt, openmpi, and zfs-fuse continue to manifest the problem.
Also crash has popped up in the most recent round of tests and it kind of looks
related.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug default/29299] binutils does not self compare properly
2022-06-29 19:16 [Bug default/29299] New: binutils does not self compare properly woodard at redhat dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-26 20:11 ` woodard at redhat dot com
@ 2022-10-14 16:00 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-10-14 16:03 ` woodard at redhat dot com
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: woodard at redhat dot com @ 2022-10-14 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libabigail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29299
--- Comment #11 from Ben Woodard <woodard at redhat dot com> ---
This appears to be fixed as of 2.1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug default/29299] binutils does not self compare properly
2022-06-29 19:16 [Bug default/29299] New: binutils does not self compare properly woodard at redhat dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2022-10-14 16:00 ` woodard at redhat dot com
@ 2022-10-14 16:03 ` woodard at redhat dot com
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: woodard at redhat dot com @ 2022-10-14 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libabigail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29299
Ben Woodard <woodard at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #12 from Ben Woodard <woodard at redhat dot com> ---
Fixed in 2.1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-10-14 16:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-06-29 19:16 [Bug default/29299] New: binutils does not self compare properly woodard at redhat dot com
2022-06-29 19:17 ` [Bug default/29299] " woodard at redhat dot com
2022-06-29 20:10 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-06-29 20:16 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-06-29 20:23 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-06-29 20:39 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-06-29 20:45 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-06-29 20:52 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-07-05 20:10 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-07-25 21:26 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-07-26 20:04 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-07-26 20:07 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-07-26 20:11 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-10-14 16:00 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-10-14 16:03 ` woodard at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).