From: "woodard at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: libabigail@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug default/29300] btrfs-progs fails self-compare only on ppc64le
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 21:12:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-29300-9487-08k0OEViTZ@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-29300-9487@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29300
--- Comment #2 from Ben Woodard <woodard at redhat dot com> ---
Another one which is also arch specific but impacts more arches than the others
mentioned below is: qt6-qtbase-6.3.0-1.fc36.aarch64.rpm
Comparing the ABI of binaries between qt6-qtbase-6.3.0-1.fc36.aarch64.rpm and
qt6-qtbase-6.3.0-1.fc36.aarch64.rpm:
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'libQt6Core.so.6.3.0' ====
======== comparing'libQt6Network.so.6.3.0' to itself wrongly yielded result:
===========
Functions changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added function
Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 2 Changed, 0 Added variables
2 Changed variables:
[C] 'QString activeBackendName' was changed to 'static QString
QSslSocketPrivate::activeBackendName' at qsslsocket_p.h:197:1:
declaration name changed from 'activeBackendName' to
'QSslSocketPrivate::activeBackendName'
[C] 'QMutex backendMutex' was changed to 'static QMutex
QSslSocketPrivate::backendMutex' at qsslsocket_p.h:196:1:
declaration name changed from 'backendMutex' to
'QSslSocketPrivate::backendMutex'
===SELF CHECK FAILED for 'libQt6Network.so.6.3.0'
This affects the following arches:
aarch64, armv7hl, i686, ppc64le, s390x
but it does not appear to affect x86_64 for some reason.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-29 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-29 19:22 [Bug default/29300] New: " woodard at redhat dot com
2022-06-29 19:23 ` [Bug default/29300] " woodard at redhat dot com
2022-06-29 21:05 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-06-29 21:12 ` woodard at redhat dot com [this message]
2022-07-04 12:55 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2022-07-26 19:47 ` woodard at redhat dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-29300-9487-08k0OEViTZ@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=libabigail@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).