public inbox for libabigail@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "woodard at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: libabigail@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug default/29413] libabigail 2.1 self-compare metabug
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 13:45:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-29413-9487-V4vH2t1Wor@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-29413-9487@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29413

Ben Woodard <woodard at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |29414

--- Comment #5 from Ben Woodard <woodard at redhat dot com> ---
I think from a morphological level, I’ve got basically 4 clumps

There are the ones which have no information like binutils and eccodes
sometimes they are arch specific which makes me wonder if there are two things
in there. The original bug which manifested this is the one for binutils 29299
however probably the best example is eccodes.

Then there are the ones like darktable 29414 which are confusion between
typdefs and structs, template instantiations, or classes. I think that these
are regressions from the past couple of patches.

Then there are the ones which are C++ related and show up as a rather large
number of filtered errors and also vtable changes 29407

Finally there are ones which seem to be some size confusion in the types. One
package that exhibits this is hercules. I want to see how the other fixes
finally play out before I file that one.

With the 2.5 test run nearing completion we currently have 42 packages which
have self-compare problems. Dodji is expecting rather significant changes to
the C comparison engine when he lands the binutils fix. I'll do another test
run at that point see how many of these were resolved.

Unsorted list of packages which have self-compare problems:
389-ds-base
arm-none-eabi-gcc-cs
binutils
crash
darktable
eccodes
enlightenment
freefem++
gsoap
hercules
iaito
infinipath-psm
insight
kcov
kdepim-addons
kf5-libktorrent
kf5-mailcommon
kim-api
kscope
lammps
libcouchbase
libomp
libXt
lighttpd
llvm
mono
nest
octave
OpenMolcas
openmpi
pocl
proxysql
qgis
qt6-qtbase
redis
smesh
stratagus
unicorn
v8-314
vsomeip3
wimlib
zfs-fuse


Referenced Bugs:

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29414
[Bug 29414] darktable fails -self-compare
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-28 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-26 19:46 [Bug default/29413] New: " woodard at redhat dot com
2022-07-26 19:47 ` [Bug default/29413] " woodard at redhat dot com
2022-07-26 20:04 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-07-26 20:23 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-07-27  0:23 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-07-28 13:45 ` woodard at redhat dot com [this message]
2022-10-11 17:52 ` [Bug default/29413] libabigail 2.1.1 " woodard at redhat dot com
2022-10-11 17:58 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-10-11 18:10 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-10-11 22:27 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-10-14 16:02 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-10-14 16:03 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-10-14 16:05 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-10-14 16:35 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-10-14 16:48 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-10-14 16:52 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-10-14 17:03 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-10-14 17:05 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-10-14 17:26 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-10-14 18:37 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-10-14 18:41 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-10-14 21:37 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-10-14 22:15 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2022-12-16 21:20 ` [Bug default/29413] libabigail 2.2 " woodard at redhat dot com
2022-12-16 21:28 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2023-03-21 10:36 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2023-03-27 20:15 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2023-03-27 20:15 ` [Bug default/29413] libabigail 2.3 " woodard at redhat dot com
2023-03-27 20:21 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2023-03-31 19:22 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2023-04-03 22:10 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2023-04-07 18:24 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2023-04-26 12:38 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2023-05-17 15:36 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2023-05-18 19:19 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2023-05-18 20:45 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2023-05-18 20:51 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2023-05-18 22:07 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2023-05-18 22:11 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2023-05-18 22:13 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2023-05-18 22:25 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2023-05-18 22:33 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2023-05-18 22:38 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2023-06-02 17:49 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2023-06-05 12:09 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2023-06-05 15:09 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2023-06-05 15:12 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2023-06-22  7:58 ` dodji at redhat dot com
2024-04-22 10:13 ` dodji at seketeli dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-29413-9487-V4vH2t1Wor@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=libabigail@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).