From: "woodard at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: libabigail@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug default/29686] New: haproxy fromF37 asserts when attempting a self compare
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 19:04:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-29686-9487@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29686
Bug ID: 29686
Summary: haproxy fromF37 asserts when attempting a self compare
Product: libabigail
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: default
Assignee: dodji at redhat dot com
Reporter: woodard at redhat dot com
CC: libabigail at sourceware dot org
Target Milestone: ---
This problem is unique but there is very little to go on:
abipkgdiff: ../../../libabigail/src/abg-comparison.cc:4543: void
abigail::comparison::class_or_union_diff::ensure_lookup_tables_populated()
const: Assertion `__abg_cond__' failed.
abipkgdiff: ../../../libabigail/src/abg-comparison.cc:4543: void
abigail::comparison::class_or_union_diff::ensure_lookup_tables_populated()
const: Assertion `__abg_cond__' failed.
abipkgdiff: ../../../libabigail/src/abg-comparison.cc:4543: void
abigail::comparison::class_or_union_diff::ensure_lookup_tables_populated()
const: Assertion `__abg_cond__' failed.
abipkgdiff: ../../../libabigail/src/abg-comparison.cc:4543: void
abigail::comparison::class_or_union_diff::ensure_lookup_tables_populated()
const: Assertion `__abg_cond__' failed.
abipkgdiff: ../../../libabigail/src/abg-comparison.cc:4543: void
abigail::comparison::class_or_union_diff::ensure_lookup_tables_populated()
const: Assertion `__abg_cond__' failed.
Comparing the ABI of binaries between haproxy-2.6.6-2.fc37.aarch64.rpm and
haproxy-2.6.6-2.fc37.aarch64.rpm:
Comparing the ABI of binaries between haproxy-2.6.6-2.fc37.i686.rpm and
haproxy-2.6.6-2.fc37.i686.rpm:
Comparing the ABI of binaries between haproxy-2.6.6-2.fc37.ppc64le.rpm and
haproxy-2.6.6-2.fc37.ppc64le.rpm:
Comparing the ABI of binaries between haproxy-2.6.6-2.fc37.s390x.rpm and
haproxy-2.6.6-2.fc37.s390x.rpm:
Comparing the ABI of binaries between haproxy-2.6.6-2.fc37.x86_64.rpm and
haproxy-2.6.6-2.fc37.x86_64.rpm:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next reply other threads:[~2022-10-14 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-14 19:04 woodard at redhat dot com [this message]
2022-10-14 19:04 ` [Bug default/29686] " woodard at redhat dot com
2023-01-07 17:15 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2023-03-23 22:56 ` woodard at redhat dot com
2023-03-24 22:38 ` [Bug default/29686] Wrong test for the presence of anonymous data member in a struct or union dodji at redhat dot com
2023-03-26 15:01 ` dodji at redhat dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-29686-9487@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=libabigail@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).