From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C08CA3858D1E; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 10:11:15 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C08CA3858D1E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1687774275; bh=eXqn2ij2rB2NQ6VrZ2ezl5PYKZptxt55cDPKTwj+eVA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xGPcMCthkEVipkmJeB6OeyIFmzdlsOXIcsvkHmfbgOv5bnDiqSkMYFxj5DuFtKPq1 Ee8hkMiFppiuq3iRfLn65y1USyKzXQx1GcvFLIg20EYDkZMOO/sgHA0vSL2VX6wbON QMwQxHLtG9of7SO4xz5EUTAF8pwYb1JB/bqozsWA= From: "dodji at redhat dot com" To: libabigail@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug default/30034] [libabigail] Handle library splitting Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 10:11:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: libabigail X-Bugzilla-Component: default X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: dodji at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dodji at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D30034 --- Comment #19 from dodji at redhat dot com --- (In reply to David Marchand from comment #17) > Once I disable CTF support, it can compile fine. >=20 > So I ran DPDK full ABI check: >=20 > Before (w/o follow dependencies): > real 0m2,951s > user 0m22,876s > sys 0m3,724s >=20 > After (with follow dependencies): > real 0m21,659s > user 3m4,138s > sys 1m52,617s >=20 > I did not look too much into it yet, but it seems significantly heavier. Hmmh, I am wondering if you have *all* the dependencies of the library, including all system libraries and everything (like libc etc) in the dependencies directory specified by --deps-dir{1,2}. If so, then it's norm= al that things are much heavier. To know what dependencies are taken into account account by abidiff, I have just added a --list-dependencies option to abidiff in the branch. Could you please provide me with the list of deps so that we have an idea? Here is how the --list-dependencies option can be used: $ time /home/dodji/git/libabigail/PR30034/build/tools/abidiff --follow-dependencies --list-dependencies --suppr libabigail.abignore --no-added-syms --headers-dir1 reference/include --headers-dir2 split/inclu= de --deps-dir1 reference/lib64 --deps-dir2 split/lib64 reference/lib64/librte_eal.so split/lib64/librte_eal.so Functions changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed (1 filtered out), 0 Added (12 filtered out) functions Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added variable /home/dodji/git/libabigail/PR30034/build/tools/.libs/lt-abidiff: dependencies of 'reference/lib64/librte_eal.so': reference/lib64/librte_kvargs.so.23, reference/lib64/librte_telemetry.so.23 /home/dodji/git/libabigail/PR30034/build/tools/.libs/lt-abidiff: dependencies of 'split/lib64/librte_eal.so': split/lib64/librte_kvargs.so.23, split/lib64/librte_log.so.= 23, split/lib64/librte_telemetry.so.23 real 0m0,662s user 0m0,638s sys 0m0,026s $ Thanks. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=