From: "dodji at seketeli dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: libabigail@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug default/31668] New: ABI self-comparison fails on btrfs-progs in Fedora 39 with libabigail 2.5.
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:58:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-31668-9487@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31668
Bug ID: 31668
Summary: ABI self-comparison fails on btrfs-progs in Fedora 39
with libabigail 2.5.
Product: libabigail
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: default
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: dodji at seketeli dot org
CC: libabigail at sourceware dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Steps to reproduce:
$ time ./tools/fedabipkgdiff --abipkgdiff build/tools/abipkgdiff
--self-compare --from fc39 btrfs-progs
Comparing the ABI of binaries between btrfs-progs-6.8-1.fc39.aarch64.rpm
and btrfs-progs-6.8-1.fc39.aarch64.rpm:
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-convert' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'mkfs.btrfs' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfstune' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-image' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-map-logical' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-select-super' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-find-root' ====
Comparing the ABI of binaries between btrfs-progs-6.8-1.fc39.i686.rpm and
btrfs-progs-6.8-1.fc39.i686.rpm:
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-convert' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'mkfs.btrfs' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-image' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfstune' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-map-logical' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-find-root' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-select-super' ====
Comparing the ABI of binaries between btrfs-progs-6.8-1.fc39.ppc64le.rpm
and btrfs-progs-6.8-1.fc39.ppc64le.rpm:
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs' ====
================ changes of 'btrfs-convert'===============
Functions changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed (134 filtered out), 0
Added functions
Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added variable
================ end of changes of 'btrfs-convert'===============
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'mkfs.btrfs' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-image' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfstune' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-map-logical' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-find-root' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-select-super' ====
Comparing the ABI of binaries between btrfs-progs-6.8-1.fc39.s390x.rpm and
btrfs-progs-6.8-1.fc39.s390x.rpm:
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-convert' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'mkfs.btrfs' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-image' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfstune' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-find-root' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-map-logical' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-select-super' ====
Comparing the ABI of binaries between btrfs-progs-6.8-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm and
btrfs-progs-6.8-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm:
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-convert' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'mkfs.btrfs' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-image' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfstune' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-map-logical' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-find-root' ====
==== SELF CHECK SUCCEEDED for 'btrfs-select-super' ====
real 0m6,994s
user 0m19,945s
sys 0m2,321s
$
The relevant part of the error message is:
Comparing the ABI of binaries between btrfs-progs-6.8-1.fc39.ppc64le.rpm
and btrfs-progs-6.8-1.fc39.ppc64le.rpm:
[...]
================ changes of 'btrfs-convert'===============
Functions changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed (134 filtered out), 0
Added functions
Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added variable
================ end of changes of 'btrfs-convert'===============
We should not have that error message.
This was first reported downstream at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275972.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next reply other threads:[~2024-04-22 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-22 9:58 dodji at seketeli dot org [this message]
2024-04-22 10:03 ` [Bug default/31668] " dodji at seketeli dot org
2024-04-22 10:13 ` dodji at seketeli dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-31668-9487@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=libabigail@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).