From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26E5D3947421 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 16:47:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 26E5D3947421 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 036GfwD2055165; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 12:46:52 -0400 Received: from ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (1b.90.2fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.47.144.27]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3082pdk14n-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:46:52 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 036GZpfs022586; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 16:46:51 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.20]) by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 306hv69f5k-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 06 Apr 2020 16:46:51 +0000 Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.237]) by b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 036Gko5637945652 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 6 Apr 2020 16:46:50 GMT Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F235C6057; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 16:46:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1A9C6055; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 16:46:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.85.183.58] (unknown [9.85.183.58]) by b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 16:46:49 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] ldbl-128ibm: simplify iscanonical.h To: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho , "Paul E. Murphy" , libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <20200327211801.31234-1-murphyp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200327211801.31234-3-murphyp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <871rp4miqz.fsf@linux.ibm.com> From: Paul E Murphy Message-ID: <00949bd3-4c66-2ab1-0f4c-6d42459f70e2@linux.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 11:46:48 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <871rp4miqz.fsf@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-04-06_08:2020-04-06, 2020-04-06 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2004060133 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 16:47:15 -0000 Pushed. Thanks! On 4/3/20 3:12 PM, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote: > "Paul E. Murphy via Libc-alpha" writes: > >> The test for enabling _Float128 or IEEE 128 long double can be >> greatly simplified knowing that there is no ibm128, thus we require >> no special cases, and everything is canonical. >> >> This reverts the changes to ldbl-128ibm iscanonical.h from commit >> 8dbfea3a2094798a52cebddde01d255483f49665 and extends the check >> for __NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH to include a check for float128 redirects >> to long double. > > Reviewed-by: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho >