From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp90.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp90.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.90]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D51303858D37 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 12:24:37 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org D51303858D37 X-Auth-ID: tom@honermann.net Received: by smtp28.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: tom-AT-honermann.net) with ESMTPSA id 304AD400BC; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 07:24:37 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3]: C++20 P0482R6 and C2X N2653: Implement mbrtoc8, c8rtomb, char8_t To: Adhemerval Zanella , Joseph Myers Cc: libc-alpha References: <386a928a-1fdc-d2c9-8815-0e39ee5fb873@linaro.org> From: Tom Honermann Message-ID: <021f1f3c-55ad-888c-0852-ffc1aba8d7f0@honermann.net> Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 07:24:36 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <386a928a-1fdc-d2c9-8815-0e39ee5fb873@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Classification-ID: 34345332-45d4-464a-a371-8f3080f74fbd-1-1 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 12:24:38 -0000 On 1/21/22 3:01 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > > On 20/01/2022 20:17, Tom Honermann via Libc-alpha wrote: >> On 1/11/22 2:23 PM, Tom Honermann via Libc-alpha wrote: >>> On 1/10/22 7:53 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: >>>> This patch is adding a NEWS entry for 2.34.  Since the next release is >>>> 2.35, it should add an entry there instead (except we've started release >>>> slush for 2.35, so it might be better to aim this at 2.36). >>>> >>> Thank you for spotting that; this was due to a bad merge conflict resolution on my part. Fixed patch attached. >>> >>> If this needs to wait for 2.36, I understand, but I would love to have this in 2.35 to close out this gap in C++20 support. >> Any further comments on this patch series? >> >> Tom. >> > I think it is too late for 2.35, but I will take to check when 2.36 opens. I understand. Thank you! I'll repost the patch series with the changes needed for 2.36 once 2.35 is released. Tom.