From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 51885 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2016 12:47:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 51876 invoked by uid 89); 6 Sep 2016 12:47:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Okay X-HELO: mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com X-IBM-Helo: d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: stli@linux.vnet.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] S390: Support PLT and GOT references in check-localplt. To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <0a0bb853-6864-1df0-43e6-6cb546244d62@redhat.com> <862da829-0cfd-2753-8c34-d72e62e24122@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <3f579b6b-b53d-c423-395a-e75ec9c5e571@redhat.com> From: Stefan Liebler Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 12:47:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3f579b6b-b53d-c423-395a-e75ec9c5e571@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 16090612-0020-0000-0000-000001F4FE15 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 16090612-0021-0000-0000-00001D5E7D2E Message-Id: <0795fa89-48e6-8069-d293-677670563c36@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-09-06_04:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1604210000 definitions=main-1609060200 X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00088.txt.bz2 On 09/05/2016 09:23 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 09/05/2016 09:08 AM, Stefan Liebler wrote: >> Florian, >> >> How to proceed here? >> I'd like to commit this patch this week as it's the same behaviour on >> s390 as on other architectures. >> Any objection? > > Not from me. I was hoping that someone would comment who actually knows > what's going on (i.e., why the remaining reference to __libc_memalign > can't be hidden). > > Thanks, > Florian > Okay. Then I committed it. Thanks.