public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
	libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Removing the glibc NaCl port
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 18:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a4e39b6-d724-4c06-c987-0b742fc123b5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36f50cc7-ec80-9c38-9c52-f4dbb52290c0@linaro.org>

On 04/13/2017 07:44 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> 
> 
> On 13/04/2017 12:45, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> I just realized that my pipe2 removal probably breaks the NaCl port.
>>
>> Can we remove it?  It blocks useful cleanups which are compatible with the out-of-tree Hurd port.
>>
>> I don't think anyone has ever reported test results for release builds. scripts/build-many-glibcs.py lacks support for it, so we don't even know if it still builds.
>>
>> I hope this proposal is not too controversial.


> Also last time I check from official documentation [1], it uses ancient
> version without any documentation to actually build/check glibc on it.
> I have the impression it is bit-rotten for some time.
> 
> If the idea is to keep supporting, I think we need at least proper
> documentation on how to actually build and tests, preferable with
> build-many-glibc.py support.
> 
> [1] https://developer.chrome.com/native-client/sdk/download

There is a Git repository with a NaCl port to GCC 4.9, it seems:

https://chromium.googlesource.com/native_client/nacl-gcc/+/ng/4.9/master

Version-wise, this is sufficient to build glibc (unlike the 
GCC-4.4-derived version in Fedora).  I have not checked if it actually 
works.  GCC upstream no longer supports any of the 4.x branches, so this 
is a dead end anyway.

The NaCl SDK seems to have switched to Clang/LLVM, and therefore cannot 
build glibc anymore.  (I checked the pepper_56 bundle.)

Thanks,
Florian

      reply	other threads:[~2017-04-13 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-13 15:45 Florian Weimer
2017-04-13 17:44 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2017-04-13 18:11   ` Florian Weimer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0a4e39b6-d724-4c06-c987-0b742fc123b5@redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).