From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22818 invoked by alias); 31 May 2017 01:06:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22801 invoked by uid 89); 31 May 2017 01:06:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*R:D*sourceware.org X-HELO: homiemail-a119.g.dreamhost.com Reply-To: siddhesh@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] tunables: Use glibc.tune.hwcap_mask tunable instead of _dl_hwcap_mask To: Adhemerval Zanella , libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <1495743960-23665-1-git-send-email-siddhesh@sourceware.org> <1495743960-23665-2-git-send-email-siddhesh@sourceware.org> <662309a0-3c5a-41e3-43b0-50e6ec987706@sourceware.org> From: Siddhesh Poyarekar Message-ID: <0bf0ccc8-2bc1-8404-d96a-7eb364503f1c@sourceware.org> Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 01:06:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg00893.txt.bz2 On Wednesday 31 May 2017 06:18 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > I would prefer to maintain consistence and avoid trying to figure out in > which order should I apply the patches to actually test it. So If I get it > right, I need to apply v2 patch 1 and patch2, v3 patch 1 to 4, and finally > v2 patch 5? I'll just push 4/5 and resend the series. Sorry I didn't realize how much of a bother this would be :) Siddhesh