From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 412A53858CD1 for ; Wed, 1 May 2024 20:04:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 412A53858CD1 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 412A53858CD1 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1714593884; cv=none; b=ZLVQp47754xD9mL8MJiYf3wZad4bKRbDMcEJFdmqqm5MrI5ryvF2a2QKEhUBid0bFzmbAvBCMDVAiWNi9BSuK2UfglfKjcu8L5FKLUXKoJrHZTIqaj5UJH5t3mWlzHApsQZdzYHzUvG+Yuhbye8XqbKelZ4un65Wx4dkvxiIB+w= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1714593884; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LYdoCPBkAdJksU687Wxtbn1L4GJMcmahI0TrxI3CW5o=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=Ga9sIs1WIo7I/kVjXrsLz1aB/2t58WnogX0Sq7NzXpqEWnCbFA5X3dk4QrIo+xG8Xrt8AW6j/bhlcDsZ6mn0PTeOQN4+3gmQfgfsOm38OR+N6e7QEhkVQSH7brFAUCTn5dd5oVHrJs13Ti20SxIKMDZhUQZb9BrSKVXDFZC3Cw0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1714593882; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hn4whQJjlY9VTgxRuRut7vPBf+WgvOvrjoelI5xMDwI=; b=TvOY7P1AwJcroNZtsfMiLI/hEkVyYNj9MV/hqeDijER0NeIq6N6HUznPJDRkk7tFOrJ2ZZ R0H2tXqxAs0AJjk/slMrirPcPctcyCAVuX5EgHyiF+/7bV1sKkk7v+VBIlPzfPpoYD0mjV 46zwIDaCqcrsKyJuqoUjLaH3qQv8F+E= Received: from mail-qk1-f198.google.com (mail-qk1-f198.google.com [209.85.222.198]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-255-bpDuD_KBNv6q5PxvMXBYsA-1; Wed, 01 May 2024 16:04:39 -0400 X-MC-Unique: bpDuD_KBNv6q5PxvMXBYsA-1 Received: by mail-qk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7926c07a543so90992385a.3 for ; Wed, 01 May 2024 13:04:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714593879; x=1715198679; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hn4whQJjlY9VTgxRuRut7vPBf+WgvOvrjoelI5xMDwI=; b=f6KWlUmwsPmUUW7zI0BWqHdHQtxyniBiYq1MPegPerYdD+FWpsQ3ZWz5eCKy6nvGpg 5AuAKEBzn/nsWOEiAUaKlTlOeuRQmCN5G7KU2JnkOqp/tNnVqQ+16m+WjCv9EZsExNqS zHsYhTN/QM1AdbnkSbkpEQQrAHuJrZN+zkh1xTcn0Llxbx5xeS0PUl8GusRKQsCQbIRx ewXi4p5IoUwQgby4rTKedOdttRsBilRoi1jOucxx6lAfLcFI/2RrwCCntUjDxwaSBwFw a4OXylHysSG23ZqP879Q3Ua2rfIm4tG63hrS0D2UVL6rHiPAru4d7Jk0BArSHbQvhyAj 4P0Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVfaOcrQZwydck416ANCt3En2yrtyuJtKdNmrXjKtVCKjNUffJamn9gAv64Wu+SyJlGR0HwoA+jAXM5khbgywATbyspxu71rSQr X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy5wR7oiSWKVhlFGkjtqJFHyzpHLoqgOdREuh3esJ51jozZBp+Z uzDa+hKZzNbhfT7dk03G6myLxhpKw/5MPB+NLY+iOyaM/iUtnt/RVmUMjSt2sqe8doaGVp9sPC5 pVR003WtG6LzhLhManyRO3ue8OlFCrRTAKooYl8jVIxPE40ZvYGTmu1q2lg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:112e:b0:790:f60b:a32f with SMTP id p14-20020a05620a112e00b00790f60ba32fmr3568591qkk.65.1714593879145; Wed, 01 May 2024 13:04:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFiklTpFRWuk65XKDG0WELHVTX/C7gRR/WsM4AvIGgSPO4koHg0idlgiG3Rw4bWIP0F2VrcbQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:112e:b0:790:f60b:a32f with SMTP id p14-20020a05620a112e00b00790f60ba32fmr3568565qkk.65.1714593878763; Wed, 01 May 2024 13:04:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.130] (130-44-146-16.s12558.c3-0.arl-cbr1.sbo-arl.ma.cable.rcncustomer.com. [130.44.146.16]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f18-20020a05620a20d200b0078eaf335331sm12550761qka.77.2024.05.01.13.04.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 May 2024 13:04:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <0d0af1d9-21f8-4c60-ad4c-cd82c0c0cabb@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 16:04:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans To: Jeff Law Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Overseers mailing list , Mark Wielaard , Joseph Myers , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey References: <20240417232725.GC25080@gnu.wildebeest.org> <20240418173726.GD9069@redhat.com> <87v849qudy.fsf@tromey.com> <87wmooep76.fsf@tromey.com> <0347e05a-94c6-4ecc-aa8f-cc90358a813d@gmail.com> From: Jason Merrill In-Reply-To: <0347e05a-94c6-4ecc-aa8f-cc90358a813d@gmail.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 5/1/24 12:15, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 4/22/24 9:24 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >> Jason> Someone mentioned earlier that gerrit was previously tried >> Jason> unsuccessfully. >> >> We tried it and gdb and then abandoned it.  We tried to integrate it >> into the traditional gdb development style, having it send email to >> gdb-patches.  I found these somewhat hard to read and in the end we >> agreed not to use it. >> >> I've come around again to thinking we should probably abandon email >> instead.  For me the main benefit is that gerrit has patch tracking, >> unlike our current system, where losing patches is fairly routine. >> >> Jason> I think this is a common pattern in GCC at least: someone has an >> Jason> idea for a workflow improvement, and gets it working, but it >> Jason> isn't widely adopted. >> >> It essentially has to be mandated, IMO. >> >> For GCC this seems somewhat harder since the community is larger, so >> there's more people to convince. > I tend to think it's the principal reviewers that will drive this.  If > several of the key folks indicated they were going to use system XYZ, > whatever it is, that would drive everyone to that system. > > We're currently using patchwork to track patches tagged with RISC-V.  We > don't do much review with patchwork.  In that model patchwork ultimately > just adds overhead as I'm constantly trying to figure out what patches > have been integrated vs what are still outstanding. > > Patchwork definitely isn't the answer IMHO.  Nor is gitlab MRs which we > use heavily internally.  But boy I want to get away from email and to a > pull request kind of flow. Do you (or others) have any thoughts about GitLab FOSS? Jason