Sure & thank you! -a

Am Mittwoch, 24. Januar 2024, 17:25:18 CET schrieb Carlos O'Donell:
> On 1/15/24 03:55, Dennis Brendel wrote:
> > On the summary page the order of the function arguments was reversed, but it is
> > in correct order in the other places of the manual.
> 
> LGTM.
> 
> Confirmed PDF manual looks correct.
> 
> Andreas, May I please push the manual change?
> 
> This looks good to me and would correct the API descriptions.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
>  
> > BZ #27547
> > ---
> >  manual/memory.texi | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/manual/memory.texi b/manual/memory.texi
> > index 258fdbd3a0..78b657627f 100644
> > --- a/manual/memory.texi
> > +++ b/manual/memory.texi
> > @@ -1502,7 +1502,7 @@ Space}.
> >  Allocate a block of @var{size} bytes, starting on a page boundary.
> >  @xref{Aligned Memory Blocks}.
> >  
> > -@item void *aligned_alloc (size_t @var{size}, size_t @var{alignment})
> > +@item void *aligned_alloc (size_t @var{alignment}, size_t @var{size})
> 
> OK. This is correct, verified by checking the ISO C standard.
> 
> >  Allocate a block of @var{size} bytes, starting on an address that is a
> >  multiple of @var{alignment}.  @xref{Aligned Memory Blocks}.
> >  
> > @@ -1510,7 +1510,7 @@ multiple of @var{alignment}.  @xref{Aligned Memory Blocks}.
> >  Allocate a block of @var{size} bytes, starting on an address that is a
> >  multiple of @var{alignment}.  @xref{Aligned Memory Blocks}.
> >  
> > -@item void *memalign (size_t @var{size}, size_t @var{boundary})
> > +@item void *memalign (size_t @var{boundary}, size_t @var{size})
> 
> OK. This is correct, verified against deployed malloc.h and BSD memalign().
> 
> >  Allocate a block of @var{size} bytes, starting on an address that is a
> >  multiple of @var{boundary}.  @xref{Aligned Memory Blocks}.
> >  
> 
> 


-- 
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer
(council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)