public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
To: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] Make libc symbols hidden in static PIE
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:10:03 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12d40524-2c44-68b3-0a06-6bfe28a3b041@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d7eb5cfd6953e9689c0306d808e234bd00741e6e.1611155254.git.szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>



On 20/01/2021 12:31, Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha wrote:
> Hidden visibility can avoid indirections and RELATIVE relocs in
> static PIE libc.
> 
> The check should use IS_IN_LIB instead of IS_IN(libc) since all
> symbols are defined locally in static PIE and the optimization is
> useful in all libraries not just libc. However the test system
> links objects from libcrypt.a into dynamic linked test binaries
> where hidden visibility does not work.  I think mixing static and
> shared libc components in the same binary should not be supported
> usage, but to be safe only use hidden in libc.a.

Why do we need this linkage for testing? Could we fix it so this
change could be used in all static libraries?

> 
> On some targets (i386) this optimization cannot be applied because
> hidden visibility PIE ifunc functions don't work, so it is gated by
> NO_HIDDEN_EXTERN_FUNC_IN_PIE.
> 
> From -static-pie linked 'int main(){}' this shaves off 71 relative
> relocs on aarch64 and reduces code size by about 2k.

Nice.

LGTM, thanks.

Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella  <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>

> ---
>  include/libc-symbols.h | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/libc-symbols.h b/include/libc-symbols.h
> index ea126ae70c..f4dd735555 100644
> --- a/include/libc-symbols.h
> +++ b/include/libc-symbols.h
> @@ -434,13 +434,18 @@ for linking")
>    strong_alias(real, name)
>  #endif
>  
> -#if defined SHARED || defined LIBC_NONSHARED \
> -  || (BUILD_PIE_DEFAULT && IS_IN (libc))
> +#if defined SHARED || defined LIBC_NONSHARED
>  # define attribute_hidden __attribute__ ((visibility ("hidden")))
>  #else
>  # define attribute_hidden
>  #endif
>  
> +/* Mark all symbols hidden in static PIE libc to avoid GOT indirections.  */
> +#if BUILD_PIE_DEFAULT && !defined NO_HIDDEN_EXTERN_FUNC_IN_PIE \
> +    && IS_IN (libc) && !defined LIBC_NONSHARED
> +# pragma GCC visibility push(hidden)
> +#endif
> +
>  #define attribute_tls_model_ie __attribute__ ((tls_model ("initial-exec")))
>  
>  #define attribute_relro __attribute__ ((section (".data.rel.ro")))
> 

Ok.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-21 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-20 15:29 [PATCH v5 0/7] fix ifunc with static pie [BZ #27072] Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-20 15:30 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] elf: Make the tunable struct definition internal only Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-20 15:30 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] elf: Avoid RELATIVE relocs in __tunables_init Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-20 15:30 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] configure: Check for static PIE support Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-21 13:59   ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-20 15:31 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] csu: Avoid weak ref for __ehdr_start in static PIE Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-20 15:36   ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-21 14:01   ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-20 15:31 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] Use hidden visibility for early static PIE code Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-21 14:04   ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-20 15:31 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] csu: Move static pie self relocation later [BZ #27072] Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-21 14:07   ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-21 15:38     ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-20 15:31 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] Make libc symbols hidden in static PIE Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-21 14:10   ` Adhemerval Zanella [this message]
2021-01-21 15:44     ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-22  1:25   ` Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
2021-01-22  9:41     ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-27  9:44   ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12d40524-2c44-68b3-0a06-6bfe28a3b041@linaro.org \
    --to=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).