public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com>
To: Martin Sebor <msebor@redhat.com>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pthread_once hangs when init routine throws an exception [BZ #18435]
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 11:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1433329653.21461.104.camel@triegel.csb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <556C8062.4010309@redhat.com>

On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 09:55 -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 06/01/2015 02:38 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > It's not immediately obvious to me why this change works. :)
> 
> The pthread_cleanup_push and pthread_cleanup_pop macros are
> defined in sysdeps/nptl/pthread.h. In C code outside of
> glibc compiled with -fexceptions (with __EXCEPTIONS defined),
> they make use of GCC attribute cleanup to invoke the cleanup
> handler during stack unwinding. (In C++ they make use of
> a destructor of a class object.) These macros do the right
> thing when an exception is thrown in the code they surround.
> 
> The problem is that the nptl/pthreadP.h header redefines
> the macros for internal use by glibc without the use of
> the cleanup attribute. As a result, when an exception is
> thrown, the cleanup handler is not invoked. This is what
> happens in pthread_once.c.
> 
> By removing the macro redefinitions from nptl/pthreadP.h
> the change causes pthread_once.c to be compiled with the
> more robust macros defined in pthread.h and allows cleanup
> to take place even after an exception has been thrown so
> long as glibc has been compiled with -fexceptions.

This sounds reasonable for me, but I don't know enough about this to
know for sure :)

I agree with the motivation of the change (ie, making it possible for
libstdc++ to use pthread_once in the implementation);  I haven't looked
at this in detail, but your arguments regarding C/C++ compatibility that
you made elsewhere in the thread seemed fine for me.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-06-03 11:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <556B7F10.40209@redhat.com>
2015-06-01  8:39 ` Florian Weimer
2015-06-01 16:27   ` Martin Sebor
2015-06-02  9:53     ` Mike Frysinger
2015-06-04 21:12       ` Martin Sebor
2015-06-03 11:36     ` Torvald Riegel [this message]
2015-06-01 10:20 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2015-06-01 19:47   ` Martin Sebor
2015-06-03 11:07     ` Torvald Riegel
2015-06-03 11:11       ` Jonathan Wakely
2015-06-03 20:14       ` Rich Felker
2015-06-03 20:24         ` Martin Sebor
2015-06-03 23:49           ` Rich Felker
2015-06-04  1:47             ` Martin Sebor
2015-06-04  5:38               ` Rich Felker
2015-06-04  7:29                 ` Martin Sebor
2015-06-08 11:41                 ` Jonathan Wakely
2015-06-08 14:38                   ` Szabolcs Nagy
2015-06-04  8:20           ` Torvald Riegel
2015-06-08 11:48             ` Jonathan Wakely
2015-06-08 16:01               ` Florian Weimer
2015-06-03 11:07   ` Torvald Riegel
2015-06-01 14:39 ` Andreas Schwab
2015-06-09 19:49 ` Martin Sebor
2015-06-15 22:14   ` Martin Sebor
2015-06-23  7:48     ` [PING 2] " Martin Sebor
     [not found]       ` <5593256B.5060402@redhat.com>
2015-07-01  0:06         ` [PING 3] " Rich Felker
2015-07-01 20:18           ` Martin Sebor
2015-07-01 21:27             ` Joseph Myers
2015-07-06 13:18   ` Szabolcs Nagy
2015-07-06 14:16     ` Martin Sebor
2015-07-06 14:58       ` Adhemerval Zanella
2015-07-06 16:33         ` Szabolcs Nagy
2015-07-06 17:09           ` Szabolcs Nagy
2015-07-08 11:00             ` Szabolcs Nagy
2015-07-08 16:09               ` Carlos O'Donell
2015-07-08 16:33                 ` Torvald Riegel
2015-07-08 16:52                   ` Szabolcs Nagy
2015-07-08 17:14                     ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-03-02 16:43                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-07-08 16:16 ` Carlos O'Donell
2015-07-08 21:28   ` Martin Sebor
2015-07-08 22:13     ` Szabolcs Nagy
2015-07-08 22:52       ` Martin Sebor
2015-07-08 23:42         ` Szabolcs Nagy
2015-07-09  4:46         ` Martin Sebor
2015-07-09 23:41           ` Martin Sebor
2021-03-03 12:52 Jakub Jelinek
2021-03-04 11:50 ` Florian Weimer
2021-03-04 13:00   ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-03-04 13:26     ` Florian Weimer
2021-03-04 14:14       ` Jakub Jelinek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1433329653.21461.104.camel@triegel.csb \
    --to=triegel@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=msebor@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).