From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-60544-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 6174 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2015 16:39:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 6163 invoked by uid 89); 1 Jul 2015 16:39:00 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Message-ID: <1435768734.4216.68.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Add and use new glibc-internal futex API.
From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>,
        GLIBC Devel
	 <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 16:39:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <mvmegksrm5a.fsf@hawking.suse.de>
References: <1434987160.25759.26.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <20150624232258.9A74C2C3B00@topped-with-meat.com>
	 <1435749621.4216.64.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <1435759803.4216.65.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <mvmegksrm5a.fsf@hawking.suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2

On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 16:24 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 13:20 +0200, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> >> Tested on x86_64-linux.  No regressions except that I am getting a
> >> check-local-headers failure:
> >> *** $(common-objpfx)stdio-common/scanf15.o:
> >> uses /usr/include/bits/syscall.h
> >> *** /usr/include/bits/syscall.h: uses /usr/include/bits/syscall.h:
> >> *** $(common-objpfx)stdio-common/scanf17.o:
> >> uses /usr/include/bits/syscall.h
> >> *** /usr/include/bits/syscall.h: uses /usr/include/bits/syscall.h:
> >> Any advice on how to fix that?
> >
> > And that regression goes away with a fresh build, not an incremental
> > build.  Sigh.
> 
> The only reason you don't get the failure with a fresh build is that
> check-local-headers runs when the *.dt files of all the test programs
> are not yet converted into *.d files.

OK, I see that now.  Is that intentional?  Or does check-local-headers
simply not work with fresh builds (which would be surprising..)?

Any further feedback on whether the actual failure reported on a
non-fresh-build makes sense, and how to fix it?