From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com>
To: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
Cc: GLIBC Devel <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][BZ #19490] Add unwind descriptors to pthread_spin_init, etc. on i386
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 11:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454326614.4592.293.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALoOobP6+GGSCMwiXsgQY4zLCXKpSsOA=4fOdB+J9q20bmtWOw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6191 bytes --]
On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 15:09 -0800, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 5:06 AM, Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > For the spinlocks, I'd really prefer if we could just remove the asm
> > files. The generic implementation should basically produce the same
> > code; if not, we should try to fix that instead of keeping the asm
> > files.
>
> Using gcc-4.8.4 (4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04):
>
> $ objdump -d nptl/pthread_spin_unlock.o
>
> nptl/pthread_spin_unlock.o: file format elf32-i386
>
>
> Disassembly of section .text:
>
> 00000000 <pthread_spin_unlock>:
> 0: f0 83 0c 24 00 lock orl $0x0,(%esp)
> 5: 8b 44 24 04 mov 0x4(%esp),%eax
> 9: c7 00 00 00 00 00 movl $0x0,(%eax)
> f: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
> 11: c3 ret
>
> This isn't quite the same as sysdeps/i386/nptl/pthread_spin_unlock.S
This is because nptl/pthread_spin_unlock.c still issues a full barrier.
If this is changed to an atomic_store_release, one gets this on x86_64:
0000000000000000 <pthread_spin_unlock>:
0: c7 07 00 00 00 00 movl $0x0,(%rdi)
6: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
8: c3
Perhaps now is a good time to finally get this done. Most archs are
already using acquire semantics, IIRC. I think aarch64 and arm are the
only major ones that happen to use the current generic unlock with full
barrier -- but they only use acquire MO on unlock, so there's really no
consistent pattern that would justify this.
Note that there's an ongoing debate about whether POSIX requires
pthread_spin_unlock to be a full barrier, whether it should or should
not do that, and whether that makes any difference for all "sane"
programs. But given that we never implemented full barriers on almost
all of the major archs and nobody complained about it, I think we should
continue to not slow down spinlocks just to make weird use cases work
(and the ones that are indeed correct under POSIX are pretty complex
pieces of code).
> For pthread_spin_lock it's much worse:
>
> $ objdump -d nptl/pthread_spin_lock.o
>
> nptl/pthread_spin_lock.o: file format elf32-i386
>
>
> Disassembly of section .text:
>
> 00000000 <pthread_spin_lock>:
> 0: 57 push %edi
> 1: b8 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%eax
> 6: 56 push %esi
> 7: 53 push %ebx
> 8: 83 ec 10 sub $0x10,%esp
> b: 8b 5c 24 20 mov 0x20(%esp),%ebx
> f: 87 03 xchg %eax,(%ebx)
> 11: 89 44 24 0c mov %eax,0xc(%esp)
> 15: 8b 44 24 0c mov 0xc(%esp),%eax
> 19: 31 ff xor %edi,%edi
> 1b: be 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%esi
> 20: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
> 22: 74 29 je 4d <pthread_spin_lock+0x4d>
> 24: 8d 74 26 00 lea 0x0(%esi,%eiz,1),%esi
> 28: 8b 03 mov (%ebx),%eax
> 2a: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
> 2c: 74 15 je 43 <pthread_spin_lock+0x43>
> 2e: ba e8 03 00 00 mov $0x3e8,%edx
> 33: eb 08 jmp 3d <pthread_spin_lock+0x3d>
> 35: 8d 76 00 lea 0x0(%esi),%esi
> 38: 83 ea 01 sub $0x1,%edx
> 3b: 74 06 je 43 <pthread_spin_lock+0x43>
> 3d: 8b 0b mov (%ebx),%ecx
> 3f: 85 c9 test %ecx,%ecx
> 41: 75 f5 jne 38 <pthread_spin_lock+0x38>
> 43: 89 f8 mov %edi,%eax
> 45: f0 0f b1 33 lock cmpxchg %esi,(%ebx)
> 49: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
> 4b: 75 db jne 28 <pthread_spin_lock+0x28>
> 4d: 83 c4 10 add $0x10,%esp
> 50: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
> 52: 5b pop %ebx
> 53: 5e pop %esi
> 54: 5f pop %edi
> 55: c3 ret
I wouldn't say it's worse. It's mostly different, and the uncontended
path may be a little worse. In the generic version, we added spinning.
This isn't really well-tuned yet, but it's something we want to do
eventually. If we assume uncontended, the initial xchg should be fast;
maybe we need to add a glibc_likely here or such, to make GCC do what we
expect; outlining the contended path (ie, the spinning and cmpxchg)
could also help work around GCC codegen deficiencies.
However, on x86_64 I get the following (adding __glibc_likely to the
atomic_exchange_acq only moves the return up):
0000000000000000 <pthread_spin_lock>:
0: b8 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%eax
5: 87 07 xchg %eax,(%rdi)
7: 89 44 24 fc mov %eax,-0x4(%rsp)
b: 8b 44 24 fc mov -0x4(%rsp),%eax
f: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
11: 75 03 jne 16 <pthread_spin_lock+0x16>
13: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
15: c3 retq
16: 45 31 c0 xor %r8d,%r8d
19: be 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%esi
1e: 8b 17 mov (%rdi),%edx
20: 85 d2 test %edx,%edx
22: 74 17 je 3b <pthread_spin_lock+0x3b>
24: ba e8 03 00 00 mov $0x3e8,%edx
29: eb 0a jmp 35 <pthread_spin_lock+0x35>
2b: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
30: 83 ea 01 sub $0x1,%edx
33: 74 06 je 3b <pthread_spin_lock+0x3b>
35: 8b 0f mov (%rdi),%ecx
37: 85 c9 test %ecx,%ecx
39: 75 f5 jne 30 <pthread_spin_lock+0x30>
3b: 44 89 c0 mov %r8d,%eax
3e: f0 0f b1 37 lock cmpxchg %esi,(%rdi)
42: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
44: 75 d8 jne 1e <pthread_spin_lock+0x1e>
46: eb cb jmp 13 <pthread_spin_lock+0x13>
The fastpath of this doesn't look bad to me (except at 7: and b:, for
which I don't see a reason).
See attached untested patch for what I played with.
[-- Attachment #2: spinlock.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 5282 bytes --]
commit f9a5437b0c0150bac4c5afd769dd6eba09fed1de
Author: Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Feb 1 12:35:50 2016 +0100
generic spinlock cleanup and x86_64 customization removal.
diff --git a/nptl/pthread_spin_lock.c b/nptl/pthread_spin_lock.c
index fb9bcc1..2209341 100644
--- a/nptl/pthread_spin_lock.c
+++ b/nptl/pthread_spin_lock.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ pthread_spin_lock (pthread_spinlock_t *lock)
We assume that the first try mostly will be successful, and we use
atomic_exchange. For the subsequent tries we use
atomic_compare_and_exchange. */
- if (atomic_exchange_acq (lock, 1) == 0)
+ if (__glibc_likely (atomic_exchange_acq (lock, 1) == 0))
return 0;
do
diff --git a/nptl/pthread_spin_unlock.c b/nptl/pthread_spin_unlock.c
index d4b63ac..ca534a0 100644
--- a/nptl/pthread_spin_unlock.c
+++ b/nptl/pthread_spin_unlock.c
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
int
pthread_spin_unlock (pthread_spinlock_t *lock)
{
- atomic_full_barrier ();
- *lock = 0;
+ atomic_store_release (lock, 0);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/sysdeps/x86_64/nptl/pthread_spin_init.c b/sysdeps/x86_64/nptl/pthread_spin_init.c
deleted file mode 100644
index f249c6f..0000000
--- a/sysdeps/x86_64/nptl/pthread_spin_init.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-#include <sysdeps/i386/nptl/pthread_spin_init.c>
diff --git a/sysdeps/x86_64/nptl/pthread_spin_lock.S b/sysdeps/x86_64/nptl/pthread_spin_lock.S
deleted file mode 100644
index b871241..0000000
--- a/sysdeps/x86_64/nptl/pthread_spin_lock.S
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
-/* Copyright (C) 2012-2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
- This file is part of the GNU C Library.
-
- The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
- modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
- License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
- version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
-
- The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
- but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
- MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
- Lesser General Public License for more details.
-
- You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
- License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see
- <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
-
-#include <lowlevellock.h>
-#include <sysdep.h>
-
-ENTRY(pthread_spin_lock)
-1: LOCK
- decl 0(%rdi)
- jne 2f
- xor %eax, %eax
- ret
-
- .align 16
-2: rep
- nop
- cmpl $0, 0(%rdi)
- jg 1b
- jmp 2b
-END(pthread_spin_lock)
diff --git a/sysdeps/x86_64/nptl/pthread_spin_trylock.S b/sysdeps/x86_64/nptl/pthread_spin_trylock.S
deleted file mode 100644
index c9c5317..0000000
--- a/sysdeps/x86_64/nptl/pthread_spin_trylock.S
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,37 +0,0 @@
-/* Copyright (C) 2002-2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
- This file is part of the GNU C Library.
- Contributed by Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>, 2002.
-
- The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
- modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
- License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
- version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
-
- The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
- but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
- MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
- Lesser General Public License for more details.
-
- You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
- License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see
- <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
-
-#include <pthread-errnos.h>
-#include <sysdep.h>
-
-
-#ifdef UP
-# define LOCK
-#else
-# define LOCK lock
-#endif
-
-ENTRY(pthread_spin_trylock)
- movl $1, %eax
- xorl %ecx, %ecx
- LOCK
- cmpxchgl %ecx, (%rdi)
- movl $EBUSY, %eax
- cmovel %ecx, %eax
- retq
-END(pthread_spin_trylock)
diff --git a/sysdeps/x86_64/nptl/pthread_spin_unlock.S b/sysdeps/x86_64/nptl/pthread_spin_unlock.S
deleted file mode 100644
index 188de2e..0000000
--- a/sysdeps/x86_64/nptl/pthread_spin_unlock.S
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
-/* Copyright (C) 2002-2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
- This file is part of the GNU C Library.
- Contributed by Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>, 2002.
-
- The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
- modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
- License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
- version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
-
- The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
- but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
- MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
- Lesser General Public License for more details.
-
- You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
- License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see
- <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
-
-#include <sysdep.h>
-
-ENTRY(pthread_spin_unlock)
- movl $1, (%rdi)
- xorl %eax, %eax
- retq
-END(pthread_spin_unlock)
-
- /* The implementation of pthread_spin_init is identical. */
- .globl pthread_spin_init
-pthread_spin_init = pthread_spin_unlock
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-01 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-24 0:18 Paul Pluzhnikov
2016-01-25 13:06 ` Torvald Riegel
2016-01-31 23:10 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2016-02-01 11:37 ` Torvald Riegel [this message]
2016-02-01 12:04 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2016-02-01 12:26 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2016-02-01 12:32 ` Torvald Riegel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1454326614.4592.293.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=triegel@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=ppluzhnikov@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).