From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-76255-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 104510 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2016 16:35:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 103895 invoked by uid 89); 22 Dec 2016 16:35:08 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=lot!, test_printers_commonpy, sk:test_pr, UD:test_printers_common.py
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Message-ID: <1482424494.14990.810.camel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11] Add pretty printers for the NPTL lock types
From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com>
To: Martin Galvan <omgalvan.86@gmail.com>
Cc: siddhesh@sourceware.org, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
        libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:35:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <CAN19L9FSEUW+1_0ziESsAd-Sr-Nd9gnk9jdTBPKiNnqmCQ2a8A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1612081855170.9769@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
	 <1481576088-15304-1-git-send-email-omgalvan.86@gmail.com>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1612141820060.32751@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
	 <CAN19L9GLm7Ey5ni=yrTQ7KioW2qF8rEHinincs85iS_2JKPmRQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAN19L9FAbzN96JMV=i=o5LNic6ctRGUnoxYqSe09NvB-ZaTJMQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <cb8ede5a-f9ce-9d3b-9fe9-b6708c1388eb@sourceware.org>
	 <CAN19L9FSEUW+1_0ziESsAd-Sr-Nd9gnk9jdTBPKiNnqmCQ2a8A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg00883.txt.bz2

On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 16:08 -0300, Martin Galvan wrote:
> 2016-12-17 16:07 GMT-03:00 Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@sourceware.org>:
> > I have pushed this for you.
> 
> Thanks a lot! :)

Is there any way to specify a different gdb binary during configure time
or such?  I've only seen the hard-coded value in
scripts/test_printers_common.py.

Testing the pretty printers if the build host gdb isn't ready out of the
box is quite annoying.  It would be good if README.pretty-printers could
be improved to cover this.