public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>,
	GLIBC Devel <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
	 Carlos O'Donell <codonell@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rwlock: Fix explicit hand-over.
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 10:47:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491475613.5374.99.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58a61371-e31e-055a-d561-c0e1c13eb7c1@redhat.com>

On Mon, 2017-03-27 at 14:59 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> Just found out that there is a regression in performance when in writer
> preferring mode. The average per-thread throughput was 4,733 ops/s with
> the old glibc, but 2,300 ops/s with the new implementation vs 32,584
> ops/s for the reader-preferring mode.

Thanks for the note.  How large is the performance difference for
different numbers of threads?  Is the old rwlock always faster in
writer-preferring mode?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-06 10:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-25 19:50 [PATCH] " Torvald Riegel
2017-03-25 20:17 ` Florian Weimer
2017-03-25 20:39   ` Torvald Riegel
2017-03-25 23:01   ` [PATCH v2] " Torvald Riegel
2017-03-27 16:09     ` Waiman Long
2017-03-27 17:54       ` Torvald Riegel
2017-03-27 18:16         ` Waiman Long
2017-03-27 18:59           ` Waiman Long
2017-03-27 19:11             ` Waiman Long
2017-04-06 10:51               ` Torvald Riegel
2017-04-06 10:47             ` Torvald Riegel [this message]
2017-04-06 10:51     ` Ping! " Torvald Riegel
2017-07-28  5:41     ` Carlos O'Donell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1491475613.5374.99.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=triegel@redhat.com \
    --cc=codonell@redhat.com \
    --cc=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).