From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 124082 invoked by alias); 8 May 2018 16:25:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 123968 invoked by uid 89); 8 May 2018 16:25:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=incredibly, badly, Especially, professional X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Message-ID: <1525796705.7567.757.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert Abortion joke removal. From: Torvald Riegel To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: Siddhesh Poyarekar , Jonathan Nieder , DJ Delorie , libc-alpha@sourceware.org Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 16:25:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: References: <20180507235151.GC10348@aiede.svl.corp.google.com> <26d9590f-6e2f-8039-005f-a433b0ac8bfd@gotplt.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-05/txt/msg00296.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2018-05-08 at 03:30 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > Of course he had > every right to feel extremely insulted for having had his explicit > request (early objection) completely ignored, regardless of his position > in the GNU project. If he behaved badly, consider he was reacting to > incredible insult. What excuse did the community have for its > incredibly insulting behavior? Really??? Is it now an "incredible insult" if community consensus considers but does not agree with your opinion? Especially if the opinion comes in the form of a 20+ year old comment? You are accusing others of bad behavior (ie, an insult) without having any reason for it at all. It was a completely professional discussion, he didn't win according to community consensus rules, that's it.