From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 102455 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2016 16:04:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 102408 invoked by uid 89); 7 Nov 2016 16:04:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=replied, protect X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Subject: Re: Caching of PID/TID after fork To: Adhemerval Zanella , libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <87y4202blm.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <87mvidj0qw.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <03127072-f944-86de-da85-cd889ce5ed76@redhat.com> <15886e77-0575-49f2-e989-dd12aba8dd97@linaro.org> From: Florian Weimer Message-ID: <15309ff1-2aa7-4b26-a079-a70830d7eb7c@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 16:04:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <15886e77-0575-49f2-e989-dd12aba8dd97@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg00241.txt.bz2 On 11/04/2016 05:03 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > > > On 04/11/2016 13:14, Florian Weimer wrote: >> On 10/10/2016 08:03 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: >>> + /* Some sanity checks for clone syscall: returned ppid should be currernt >> >> Typo: “currernt” >> >> On its own, this approach looks okay, but I am worried that it sends a message that it's okay to clone processes without additional measures to protect PRNGs and things like that. >> >> Florian > > I am not sure if you referring you to my initial RFC patch or the one > complete I sent [1] since you replied to the original thread. Oh, I'll have a look at the updated patch then. Florian