From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-74475-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 95665 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2016 11:02:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 95649 invoked by uid 89); 7 Nov 2016 11:02:15 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Wednesday, wednesday, H*r:0100, HX-Provags-ID:V03
X-HELO: mout.kundenserver.de
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Cc: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/16] Use shmat syscall for Linux implementation
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 11:02:00 -0000
Message-ID: <1569285.WyivNgpc5v@wuerfel>
User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-34-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <1478114813-3526-13-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
References: <1478114813-3526-1-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <1478114813-3526-13-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:YK6CAWZG6hQ=:ryPdUZDlFp9kgqlV7pIeh7
 cL8MO3aJOoTidMWOVnQpf+Zt/QoWmmF7KIeMotbD60KyxN3efwWSNkyM9oG/MV2ibUh2ZDVQL
 YAmgFq3rqk29nQQHfp6A8egS/0zGGaYU6yaYdSLPITfUXxMVKhcE7FCiLRNfoGjswZLuGU/dE
 Z+4095tZ2w58VnyvbtQXQRsCoVnmicuy1VxpkWWhhiZ1LuxfLpf6dY4rq/PhG+UcrL3ptvLVV
 mWs6vsz9MBrRjWR4m2lJ1qqD6ZZgwA5YxQ16WHEwTsm+F80jEjoq4vF5oZ9jBAgyanjSu4Zfh
 Ms4UvaaEnjyxTWPYoafRvJuXYqII61gaQFKwnxu90xjsP3PjOCal4GEOYUTfSwn4yrG6PlJlh
 ge6w7DND5MPIM5jS30P+Dykc4HEmhTV9I7/pVKq9UWwYg9N+HLaLsZ7KtQ+LbhN/toKtcNvto
 5o594u6tccmBgQF0FjpBqsRsAKwQOAhm6oEVdCasHNNMn/VEnPYvecEF8XN6cI/wRMRcFNSPQ
 ym6TNPclCYRWIOTi37j6t7p0W/GxwEeChDFih3Ylf0mO0ivAkc0SO1UZNkjUQx8HWHHT5GvyZ
 M1IIxa+cJC5z/MtQxFyNsYFnlqZGVNJpWbX/koLCsRQb0irMIbxB3X8IhBHyByOeVKilB7rMA
 2X9+2AEieMX5rsdZd6RXl1t190JLvYS1FUwTcs5MuFZBhimUAFyGa5TGBMjAE074a7HgkH4Cl
 qHy4pnVOkFsmmFYV
X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg00228.txt.bz2

On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 5:26:49 PM CET Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> @@ -31,17 +28,19 @@
>  void *
>  shmat (int shmid, const void *shmaddr, int shmflg)
>  {
> +#ifdef __ASSUME_SYSVIPC_SYSCALL
> +  return INLINE_SYSCALL_CALL (shmat, shmid, shmaddr, shmflg);
> +#else
>    INTERNAL_SYSCALL_DECL(err);
>    unsigned long resultvar;
>    void *raddr;
> 

I looked at the cross-reference for system call tables and found
that alpha does not define __NR_shmat but instead has __NR_osf_shmat

Will that get handled correctly by your code?

	Arnd