public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: libcidn (was: Re: Remove add-ons mechanism)
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 13:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1745056.Yiv6T0xlHe@porto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1710051253180.18935@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 866 bytes --]

Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2017, 14:54:47 CEST schrieb Joseph Myers:
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Their packaging is completely different from the libidn upstream releases.
> 
> And updating from the libidn upstream releases would be problematic given
> that it's a non-FSF-assigned project that has changed license.  (See
> however the idea of enabling glibc to dlopen unmodified upstream libidn to
> implement the functionality that uses glibc's copy of libidn, as a
> possible replacement of that copy.)

I understand...

Mostly out of curiosity, what is the usecase for the glibc-internal libidn?

A quick scan on my laptop (Gentoo Linux) shows no binaries that have 
libcidn.so in NEEDED (but many with the separate libidn.so).

-- 
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-05 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-28 17:49 Remove add-ons mechanism Joseph Myers
2017-09-28 22:01 ` Zack Weinberg
2017-09-28 22:38   ` Joseph Myers
2017-09-29 11:04   ` Florian Weimer
2017-09-30  6:35 ` Florian Weimer
2017-09-30 21:42   ` Joseph Myers
2017-10-05 10:39 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2017-10-05 11:07   ` Florian Weimer
2017-10-05 12:54     ` Joseph Myers
2017-10-05 13:16       ` Andreas K. Huettel [this message]
2017-10-05 13:39         ` libcidn Andreas Schwab
2017-10-05 13:40         ` libcidn Florian Weimer
2017-10-05 21:11       ` Remove add-ons mechanism Andreas K. Huettel
2017-10-05 21:30         ` Joseph Myers
2017-10-05 15:59 ` Joseph Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1745056.Yiv6T0xlHe@porto \
    --to=dilfridge@gentoo.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).