From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-79887-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 111419 invoked by alias); 31 May 2017 20:48:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 111406 invoked by uid 89); 31 May 2017 20:48:56 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=hear, HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit
X-HELO: mail-qk0-f181.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
         :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=V8h8UcLdNn3jS7sRWXzEwQDwPOcTXzwLeeoVCQVi88w=;
        b=Y5fFrZjQP+nMH6x539Lt6FUh6bZ+BdlUfrCZUjjbKPDGBPIYf6kMCHRMuRCv4RRRdv
         1O81xx+Yp117DL1L2aNYJUTSFLz0/nxqYqHQDiI+g2IdD4DoK3yaP0AoLEqsNboPELqB
         BL2WnnAr2Cuyzz9cL7KPOi1vqanh2n7JwZn9DQQYywlvoZayWv87PkPhzQVYwSxYAuCk
         UDk0jJ+238gXu8YBF/v8fKjo2PSYwtwGSustyoFa9ngzQ61jxVa18CyckNfVQ7a+gN4Z
         O8NZSgEdnHGO82oy9C/uPBSzBdXROP8lhc5P9ZCiXOlhMsBsSb+Qsaf8od/PQCN7ksMh
         +Ueg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAdnlZykF9aW26qRZHYu/N5hWtiKtol6eVEx9QjS4Ty0cE9L/sI
	0RFq/99vdVrhxUV6o0HH2w==
X-Received: by 10.55.116.66 with SMTP id p63mr28923214qkc.250.1496263736360;
        Wed, 31 May 2017 13:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH][BZ 2100] blowfish support in libcrypt
To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
References: <79469eab-c809-a5b8-3297-2536320a834d@gmail.com>
From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <19215b6d-f0df-5ccf-e52d-2889655e5fd7@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 20:48:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <79469eab-c809-a5b8-3297-2536320a834d@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg00915.txt.bz2



On 31/05/2017 14:33, Björn Esser wrote:
> From f781e7f3e151ed89edd357734dd457bd4cd39ec0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn=20Esser?= <besser82@fedoraproject.org>
> Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 13:37:36 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] This is an implementation of a password hashing method,
>  provided via the crypt(3) and a reentrant interface.  It is fully compatible
>  with OpenBSD's bcrypt.c for prefix "$2b$", originally by Niels Provos and
>  David Mazieres.

I would like to hear from someone more experienced with licenses if we actually
use the license on some file as-is or if we should re-license it before actually
reviewing it.